Hi guys,
Are your changes/bug fixes reflected in the Spark 2.1 release?
Iman
On Dec 2, 2016 3:03 PM, "Iman Mohtashemi" <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks again! This is very helpful!
> Best regards,
> Iman
>
> On Dec 2, 2016 2:49 PM, "Huamin Li"
an, Galway, Ireland
> Web: http://www.reza-analytics.eu/index.html
> <http://139.59.184.114/index.html>
>
> On 8 December 2016 at 01:15, Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> yes exactly. I run mine fine in Eclipse but when I run it from a
> cor
onal University of Ireland, Galway
> IDA Business Park, Dangan, Galway, Ireland
> Web: http://www.reza-analytics.eu/index.html
> <http://139.59.184.114/index.html>
>
> On 7 December 2016 at 23:39, Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> No but I tried t
No but I tried that too and still didn't work. Where are the files being
read from? From the local machine or HDFS? Do I need to get the files to
HDFS first? In Eclipse I just point to the location of the directory?
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:34 PM Md. Rezaul Karim <
ith me!
>
> I implemented these codes for my summer intern project with Mark Tygert,
> and we are currently testing the performance of the new codes.
>
> Best,
> Huamin
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
tallSkinnyQR are giving the correct results for
> indexedRowMatrix when using multiple executors or workers. Let me know if
> I should do a pull request for this.
>
> Best,
> Huamin
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Iman Mohtashemi <
> iman.mohtash...@gmail.com> wrot
ctor.WriteClusterKey(clusters.get(i));
String cValue =
detector.WriteClusterValue(clusters.get(i));
context.write(new Text(cKey), new Text(cValue));
}
}
}
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:23 AM Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmai
it ordered rows if you're
> going to use a method like the QR decomposition. That works. I don't think
> the QR method should ever have been on this class though, for this reason.
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:13 PM Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
Hi guys,
Was this bug ever resolved?
Iman
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:59 AM Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes this would be helpful, otherwise the Q part of the decomposition is
> useless. One can use that to solve the system by transposing it and
> mul
gt; existence of use cases like yours. For example, at least
> CoordinateMatrix.toIndexedRowMatrix could sort? that is less surprising.
>
> In any event you should be able to make it work by manually getting the
> RDD[IndexedRow] out of IndexedRowMatrix, sorting by index, then mapping it
>
dex, then mapping it
> to Vectors and making a RowMatrix from it.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:41 PM Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sean,
>> Here you go:
>>
>> sparsematrix.txt =
>>
>> row, col ,val
>
of this this would work??
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:41 AM Iman Mohtashemi <iman.mohtash...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> Here you go:
>
> sparsematrix.txt =
>
> row, col ,val
> 0,0,.42
> 0,1,.28
> 0,2,.89
> 1,0,.83
> 1,1,.34
> 1,2,.42
> 2,0,.23
> 3,0,.
Hi Sean,
Here you go:
sparsematrix.txt =
row, col ,val
0,0,.42
0,1,.28
0,2,.89
1,0,.83
1,1,.34
1,2,.42
2,0,.23
3,0,.42
3,1,.98
3,2,.88
4,0,.23
4,1,.36
4,2,.97
The vector is just the third column of the matrix which should give the
trivial solution of [0,0,1]
This translates to this which is
13 matches
Mail list logo
