would be frequent, and if every transaction has ever item, than
all sets are frequent and that number is indescribably large.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Ritu Raj Tiwari
<rituraj_tiw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Sean:
> Thanks for checking out my question here. Its possible I am making a new
esults
back to the driver to return them. The assumption is that there aren't
a vast number of frequent items. If they are, they aren't 'frequent'
and your min support is too low.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Ritu Raj Tiwari
<rituraj_tiw...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Folks:
&
too low.
>
> Regards
> Sab
>
>> On 13-Jan-2016 6:14 am, "Ritu Raj Tiwari" <rituraj_tiw...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> Folks:
>> We are running into a problem where FPGrowth seems to choke on data sets
>> that we think are not
Folks:We are running into a problem where FPGrowth seems to choke on data sets
that we think are not too large. We have about 200,000 transactions. Each
transaction is composed of on an average 50 items. There are about 17,000
unique item (SKUs) that might show up in any transaction.
When
