(resending...)

I was thinking the same setup… But the more I think of this problem, and
the more interesting this could be.

If we allocate 50% total memory to Tachyon statically, then the Mesos
benefits of dynamically scheduling resources go away altogether.

Can Tachyon be resource managed by Mesos (dynamically)? Any thought or
comment?

Sean
>
>
>
>
>
> >Hi Haoyuan,
>
> >So on each mesos slave node I should allocate/section off some amount
> >of memory for tachyon (let's say 50% of the total memory) and the rest
> >for regular mesos tasks?
>
> >This means, on each slave node I would have tachyon worker (+ hdfs
> >configuration to talk to s3 or the hdfs datanode) and the mesos slave
> ?process. Is this correct?
>
>
>


-- 
--Sean

Reply via email to