What bothers me is that you are making sweeping statements about Spark
inability to handle quote " ... the key weakness of Spark is 1) its poor
performance when executing concurrent queries and 2) its poor resource
utilization when executing multiple Spark applications concurrently"
and conversely
Thanks for this insight guys.
On your point below and I quote:
... "It's even as fast as Spark by using the default mr engine"
OK as we are all experimentalists, are we stating that the classic
MapReduce computation can outdo Spark's in-memory computation. I would be
curious to know this.