This class was made to be "java friendly" so that we wouldn't have to use two versions. The class itself is simple. But I agree adding java setters would be nice.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Soren Macbeth <so...@yieldbot.com> wrote: > There is a JavaSparkContext, but no JavaSparkConf object. I know SparkConf > is new in 0.9.x. > > Is there a plan to add something like this to the java api? > > It's rather a bother to have things like setAll take a scala > Traverable[String String] when using SparkConf from the java api. > > At a minimum adding methods signatures for java collections where there are > currently scala collection would be a good start. > > TIA
