t?
>
>
>
> y
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Armbrust [mailto:mich...@databricks.com]
> *Sent:* March-17-16 8:59 PM
> *To:* Younes Naguib
> *Cc:* user@spark.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Subquery performance
>
>
>
> Try running EXPLAIN on both version of the query.
Try running EXPLAIN on both version of the query.
Likely when you cache the subquery we know that its going to be small so
use a broadcast join instead of a shuffling the data.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Younes Naguib <
younes.nag...@tritondigital.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m running
Anyways to cache the subquery or force a broadcast join without persisting it?
y
From: Michael Armbrust [mailto:mich...@databricks.com]
Sent: March-17-16 8:59 PM
To: Younes Naguib
Cc: user@spark.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subquery performance
Try running EXPLAIN on both version of the query
