I believe that the implicit def is pulling in the enclosing class (in which
the def is defined) in the closure which is not serializable.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:20 AM, guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk
guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
Hi guys,
I`m puzzled why i cant use the implicit function in
in the enclosing class ?
*From:* Tathagata Das t...@databricks.com
*Date:* 2015-04-30 07:00
*To:* guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk
*CC:* user user@spark.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: implicit function in SparkStreaming
I believe that the implicit def is pulling in the enclosing class (in
which the def
Thank you for your pointers , it`s very helpful to me , in this scenario how
can i use the implicit def in the enclosing class ?
From: Tathagata Das
Date: 2015-04-30 07:00
To: guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk
CC: user
Subject: Re: implicit function in SparkStreaming
I believe that the implicit def
/xulinhao/sets
From: guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk
To: Tathagata Das t...@databricks.com
Cc: user user@spark.apache.org
Date: 2015/04/30 11:17
Subject:Re: Re: implicit function in SparkStreaming
Appreciate for your help , it works . i`m curious why
: Tathagata Das
Date: 2015-04-30 09:30
To: guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk
CC: user
Subject: Re: Re: implicit function in SparkStreaming
Could you put the implicit def in an object? That should work, as objects are
never serialized.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:28 PM, guoqing0...@yahoo.com.hk
guoqing0
