to do both steps in the first
code-base it is still much faster than the latter code-base ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/job-hangs-when-using-pipe-with-reduceByKey-tp25242p25248.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive
yes, the first code takes only 30mins.
but the second method, I wait for 5 hours, only finish 10%
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/job-hangs-when-using-pipe-with-reduceByKey-tp25242p25249.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing
76 spilling
in-memory map of 633.1 MB to disk (9 times so far)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/job-hangs-when-using-pipe-with-reduceByKey-tp25242.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing
to disk (9 times so far)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/job-hangs-when-using-pipe-with-reduceByKey-tp25242.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
gt;
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/job-hangs-when-using-pipe-with-reduceByKey-tp25242.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
