!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Performance-problems-on-SQL-JOIN-tp8001.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
);
sql(SELECT * FROM rooms2 LEFT JOIN rooms3 ON rooms2.hotelId =
rooms3.hotelId AND rooms2.toDate = rooms3.toDate).count();
Are we doing something wrong here?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Performance-problems-on-SQL-JOIN-tp8001
LEFT JOIN rooms3 ON rooms2.hotelId =
rooms3.hotelId AND rooms2.toDate = rooms3.toDate).count();
Are we doing something wrong here?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Performance-problems-on-SQL-JOIN-tp8001.html
Sent from
=
rooms3.hotelId AND rooms2.toDate = rooms3.toDate).count();
Are we doing something wrong here?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Performance-problems-on-SQL-JOIN-tp8001.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing
:219' take up the majority of the time.
Is this due to bad partitioning or caching? Or is there a problem with the
JOIN operator?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Performance-problems-on-SQL-JOIN-tp8001p8016.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User