Hi Burak,
That’s interesting. I’ll try and give it a go.
Eilidh
On 14 Nov 2015, at 04:19, Burak Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The BlockMatrix multiplication should be much more efficient on the current
> master (and will be available with Spark 1.6). Could you please give that a
We have done this by blocking but without using BlockMatrix. We used our
own blocking mechanism because BlockMatrix didn't exist in Spark 1.2. What
is the size of your block? How much memory are you giving to the executors?
I assume you are running on YARN, if so you would want to make sure your
Hi Sab,
Thanks for your response. We’re thinking of trying a bigger cluster, because we
just started with 2 nodes. What we really want to know is whether the code will
scale up with larger matrices and more nodes. I’d be interested to hear how
large a matrix multiplication you managed to do?
Hi,
The BlockMatrix multiplication should be much more efficient on the current
master (and will be available with Spark 1.6). Could you please give that a
try if you have the chance?
Thanks,
Burak
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Sabarish Sasidharan <
sabarish.sasidha...@manthan.com> wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to multiply a large squarish matrix with its transpose. Eventually
I’d like to work with matrices of size 200,000 by 500,000, but I’ve started off
first with 100 by 100 which was fine, and then with 10,000 by 10,000 which
failed with an out of memory exception.
I used MLlib and