Re: Parameters for PEAR

I'm pinging some people who might know something about LanguageWare's use of this feature. -Marshall On 1/10/2018 6:07 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 10.01.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: >>> On 16.12.2017, at 13:48, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>

Re: Parameters for PEAR

On 10.01.2018, at 12:07, Peter Klügl wrote: > > I rather wanted to ask twice before I open an issue or implement > something. Could always be that I missed something. Initially, I thought > that the IBM guys (LanguageWare) made massive use of the PEAR concept > and they

Re: Parameters for PEAR

Hi, Am 10.01.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: >> On 16.12.2017, at 13:48, Peter Klügl wrote: >> >>> Is it a problem for us to simply implement Matthias's solution: Make use >>> of the parameters in the PearSpecifier and just set them in the wrapped >>>

Re: Parameters for PEAR

ping? Am 16.12.2017 um 13:48 schrieb Peter Klügl: > Hi, > > > Am 13.12.2017 um 14:33 schrieb Peter Klügl: >> ... >> >> >> Is it a problem for us to simply implement Matthias's solution: Make use >> of the parameters in the PearSpecifier and just set them in the wrapped >> analysis engine