Here is the ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6137
Hope this suffices for a start.
Cheers,
Mario
> On 22 Oct 2019, at 09:01 , Peter Klügl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 21.10.2019 um 21:46 schrieb Mario Juric:
>> Thanks Peter,
>>
>> No problem with the delay. I was on
Hi,
Am 21.10.2019 um 21:46 schrieb Mario Juric:
> Thanks Peter,
>
> No problem with the delay. I was on vacation myself, and sometimes it is just
> necessary to pull the plug :)
>
> I am just happy that you take the time to answer my questions, and I think
> your answers help making sense to
Thanks Peter,
No problem with the delay. I was on vacation myself, and sometimes it is just
necessary to pull the plug :)
I am just happy that you take the time to answer my questions, and I think your
answers help making sense to this. I now have some ideas that I can experiment
with to see
Hi,
sorry for the delayed reply.
comments below...
Am 09.10.2019 um 22:19 schrieb Mario Juric:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks a lot for the answer.
>
> I am still trying to wrap my head around this, and I understand the issues at
> play when dealing with a generic rule engine, since I am looking at
Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot for the answer.
I am still trying to wrap my head around this, and I understand the issues at
play when dealing with a generic rule engine, since I am looking at an isolated
case only. I was just thinking that in my particular case the covering
annotation starts before
Hi Mario,
I need to take a closer look as this is not the usual scenario :-)
However, without testing, I would assume that the second rule does not
match because the space between dog and cat is not "empty".
Normally, you have a complete partitioning provided by the seeding which
causes the
Hi Peter,
I have a script that is executed without any seeders for performance reasons,
and we don’t need the seeded annotations in that case. I have an issue
involving annotation elements that partially cover the rule elements of
interest, and I do not have a simple solution for it, so I have
