Hi,
Am 13.01.2021 um 12:04 schrieb Erik Fäßler:
>> :-)
>>
>> I was looking the the Person definition there, but didn't find matching
>> features.
> Oh, sorry, I did not articulate myself clear enough: In my real case work I
> don’t have Person annotations but Organism annotation which are
>
> :-)
>
> I was looking the the Person definition there, but didn't find matching
> features.
Oh, sorry, I did not articulate myself clear enough: In my real case work I
don’t have Person annotations but Organism annotation which are derived from
ConceptMentions. And ConceptMentions have
Hi,
Am 11.01.2021 um 08:13 schrieb Erik Fäßler:
> Hello Peter,
>
> thank you again that you put so much thought it in.
> I am a bit embarrassed to say that I already had the solution in my script
> when I just opened Eclipse again. I think I just didn’t really try it because
> I didn’t expect
Hello Peter,
thank you again that you put so much thought it in.
I am a bit embarrassed to say that I already had the solution in my script when
I just opened Eclipse again. I think I just didn’t really try it because I
didn’t expect it to work.
This works now, thank you!
In order to better
Hi,
Am 07.01.2021 um 14:55 schrieb Erik Fäßler:
> Hi Peter and thank you once again for your excellent support of your
> excellent RUTA software!
You are welcome :-)
>
> Your second example was very much what I needed. Thank you so far!
> I have one last bump in the road:
>
> My Person#id
Hi Peter and thank you once again for your excellent support of your excellent
RUTA software!
Your second example was very much what I needed. Thank you so far!
I have one last bump in the road:
My Person#id feature is an FSArray with ID annotations instead of a plain
uima.cas.String. So, one
Hi Erik,
it depends on how you want to represent the information of the ids of
the covered Person annotations. You somehow need to represent the values
in the PersonEnumeration annotation. I assume that the ID feature of
Person is uima.cas.String? PersonEnumeration could either use one String
Hello everyone (and a happy new year :-)),
I have been working on the following issue: Whenever there is conjunction in
text of two entities (e.g. [...]Biden and Trump ran for president […]) I create
a new annotation spanning both entities and the conjunction ([Biden and
Trump]_coordination).
