d rerun
> the
> > tests.
> >
> > Alan Diego
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:42 AM James Green
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Following-up as I've run more tests.
> > >
> > > My minimal
(e.g. 1KB) payloads, what does that do to your throughput on
> a single producer?
>
> Tim
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 2:54 AM James Green
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been busy shifting an existing workload into AWS recently, and a
> load
Hi all,
I've been busy shifting an existing workload into AWS recently, and a load
test shows a serious performance drop when sending to ActiveMQ which I
could use some advice on.
Quick architecture summary: We send requests via a webserver that are
forwarded as messages to a queue. A backend
For a broker that should be holding almost nothing this looks very
suspicious:
total 779M
-rw-r--r-- 1 999 docker 32M Jul 11 06:51 db-3393.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 999 docker 32M Jul 11 09:21 db-3394.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 999 docker 32M Jul 14 09:26 db-3444.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 999 docker 684M Jul 14 09:26
On 28 April 2015 at 14:09, Tim Bain tb...@alumni.duke.edu wrote:
On Apr 28, 2015 3:21 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
So to re-work my understanding, the pre-fetch buffer in the connected
client is filled with messages and the broker's queue counters react
On 27 April 2015 at 17:32, Tim Bain tb...@alumni.duke.edu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:30 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Surely if a client takes more than the receive time-out to process a
message, a re-delivery will occur? If not, what does happen?
I don't
the receive time-out to process a
message, a re-delivery will occur? If not, what does happen?
That was the documentation update I had intended under what I thought was a
very safe interpretation so far.
Tim
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:10 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm need
and go
without consuming the prefetch, which seems to be the case.
tcp://..:61616?jms.prefetchPolicy.all=100jms.redeliveryPolicy.maximumRedeliveries=-1
On 23 April 2015 at 17:14, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are not overriding so the defaults of 1s timeout
://..:61616?jms.prefetchPolicy.all=100jms.redeliveryPolicy.maximumRedeliveries=-1
On 23 April 2015 at 17:14, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We are not overriding so the defaults of 1s timeout on the receive()
and
1,000 prefetch are in play.
We are updating
wording, go ahead and update but the
performance of the system would appear to be an important factor that
people should be aware of.
On 24 April 2015 at 14:31, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
We have set the receive() timeout to 10s via the url - no DLQ issues for
the past few hours
in error... so that may be relevant[1].
A short term solution would be to ensure infinite or a very large
number of redeliveries, up from the default 6. That can be provided in
the broker url.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5735
On 23 April 2015 at 13:08, James Green
We have a camel route consuming from ActiveMQ (5.10.0 with KahaDB) and
frequently get a DLQ entry without anything logged through our errorHandler.
The only thing we have to go on is a dlqFailureCause header which says:
java.lang.Throwable: Exceeded redelivery policy limit:RedeliveryPolicy
is that activemq is WAY easier to embed than say
something like Cassandra or Elasticsearch.
So if you can easily make your own Java daemons I would recommend going
down that path.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:31 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm having a hard time getting
I'm having a hard time getting a Debian package of ActiveMQ to upgrade.
It seems that the ActiveMQ init script is told to stop. JMX is not
configured so this fails, falling back to sending a SIGKILL.
The trouble is that kill only ever returns the result of itself and does
not guarantee that the
Looking at http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html and wondering about
building a cluster of brokers for high availability.
Seems JDBC was implemented quite some time ago and has been eclipsed by
KahaDB and now LevelDB but these are local only. There's something very
shiny and new about
Ref http://activemq.apache.org/replicated-leveldb-store.html
Is this page actually detailing that Zookeeper will maintain one master
BROKER and that writes through this broker will be replicated to slave
brokers?
I read - interpreted - the URL and title as being about leveldb data being
On 3 November 2014 09:42, Vikas Agarwal vi...@infoobjects.com wrote:
Hi,
We are using ActiveMQ for 3+ years, however, we didn't test it under heavy
load. Recently, we started using ActiveMQ in another project where
sometimes load increases exponentially as we are listening to twitter
stream
We have a hub/spoke architecture. We did a rolling upgrade from 5.7.0 to
5.10.0 starting with the hub instance. So long as the client/server peer
protocols don't become incompatible it's fine.
On 15 October 2014 21:39, djdick djd...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
We're looking to upgrade from 5.9 to
Config:
managementContext
managementContext connectorPort=11099 rmiServerPort=9
jmxDomainName=org.apache.activemq/
/managementContext
Logs:
2014-09-26 14:58:31,278 | INFO | JMX consoles can connect to
I should mention that access via Jolokia works just fine.
On 26 September 2014 15:14, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Config:
managementContext
managementContext connectorPort=11099 rmiServerPort=9
jmxDomainName=org.apache.activemq
=false
ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_START=$ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_START
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
Cheers,
Geurt
-Original Message-
From: James Green [mailto:james.mk.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 4:14 PM
To: users
Subject: 5.10.0: Unable to connect via jmx
Config
I can connect using Jmxterm on the local host itself but not using
jvisualvm from another host within the firewalled network. Very odd.
On 26 September 2014 15:38, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
None of those are set here.
On 26 September 2014 15:31, Geurt Schimmel gschim
in the config and in the
connection info from JConsole?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:46 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can connect using Jmxterm on the local host itself but not using
jvisualvm from another host within the firewalled network. Very odd.
On 26 September 2014 15:38
Sounds like the issue I was observing last month. ActiveMQ was randomly
deciding to just stop delivering messages to consumers - both the shipped
web console and hawtio showed things absolutely as I would expect them to
be.
I ended up suspending new operations, allowed existing data to be
Has anyone got advice/steps to follow to record named queue sizes in say
graphite?
From there all sorts of things can happen including Nagios checking.
We have AMQ 5.10.0 installed and Hawt.io can inspect but it's really 24x7
automation we want...
Thanks,
James
As ever, I find the right search query eventually and discover what appears
to be a good solution:
https://github.com/jmxtrans/jmxtrans
On 25 September 2014 09:48, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone got advice/steps to follow to record named queue sizes in say
graphite
Having found jmxtrans I've like to update the monitoring page. I have
signed the ICLA.
Thanks,
James
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:18 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Having found jmxtrans I've like to update the monitoring page. I have
...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Apparently not. I was recently given permission to edit the camel wiki
but
evidently that was more
I've had to wait until all queues were flushed and then removed the kahadb
folder. Now it reports 0% used as expected.
Are there known issues going from 5.8.0 to 5.10.0 in-place with kahadb?
On 24 August 2014 10:09, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
One of our 5.10.0 brokers
The book, ActiveMQ in Action, exists and would be useful to a person such
as yourself.
On 24 August 2014 03:40, Bob M rgmatth...@orcon.net.nz wrote:
Hi
I am completely out of my depth here and seek advice please...
I have a java program that trades on the forex market via a broker in
August 2014 10:18, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Usually a restart of amq resolves this issue. Today is different.
After two restarts I see a few dozen messages dequeued then its all stop.
Nothing in the logs other than DEBUG or INFO. Other servers appear fine.
I can use stomp
One of our 5.10.0 brokers is reporting memory storage at 70% used. Yet
there is nothing pending on any queues and should be nothing in any topics
either.
The queues and topics look identical to those on another 5.10.0 broker
which sits happily at 0% memory used.
What can I do to debug this?
.
Thanks,
James
On 21 August 2014 09:49, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
One of our spoke machines shows evidence that it is not delivering the
messages to consumers as expected. Of the queues in question is named
DeliveryNotifications.Inbound and I've switched on debug logging
One of our spoke machines shows evidence that it is not delivering the
messages to consumers as expected. Of the queues in question is named
DeliveryNotifications.Inbound and I've switched on debug logging to
capture what I can.
During the following log segment you can see there are messages for
See http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/PPA-for-Debs-td4683151.html
On 29 July 2014 00:51, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
I'm thinking about creating debian packages for 5.10 …
doesn't seem like they exist for 5.10 from debian directly.
… and it seems like activemq deserves
AMQ-5285. May need to be moved to another project - no components listed
mentioning build processes.
On 22 July 2014 23:04, Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk wrote:
On 22/07/14 14:33, James Green wrote:
I might have to add a ticket to get this included at the end of the build
pipeline
, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
I stumbled on fpm and then onto a project that uses fpm to create
ActiveMQ
debs from tarballs:
https://github.com/rgevaert/activemq2deb
After a few fixes (a PR is pending) I've managed to publish 5.7.0 and
5.10.0 to bintray. If anyone would
If I look at activemq.apache.org in Chrome it's missing a lot of styling.
According to the Chrome logs it's an https web page trying to load
resources from http and that's not allowed.
Firefox has things fine.
Hopefully someone can issue a fix as it looks like yet another project not
being
://dl.bintray.com/jmkgreen/deb /
You should be able to apt-get update then apt-get install activemq and see
it fire up. The folders look pretty reasonable for a debian system. The
packages are not signed.
Thanks,
James
On 14 July 2014 11:23, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote
wrote:
On 11/07/14 16:13, James Green wrote:
I cannot find a source of ActiveMQ Debian packages that are up to date. Is
there one?
We're trying to install all new servers using apt-get almost exclusively,
yet have the need of improvements in 5.9. Others in the company are noting
RabbitMQ
I cannot find a source of ActiveMQ Debian packages that are up to date. Is
there one?
We're trying to install all new servers using apt-get almost exclusively,
yet have the need of improvements in 5.9. Others in the company are noting
RabbitMQ does and are suggesting we should take a look...
Either give the messages an expiration time or write something to drain the
destinations according to your own business logic. Then
gcInactiveDestinations doesn't need to care about your specific use-case.
On 28 June 2013 20:42, Paul Gale paul.n.g...@gmail.com wrote:
gcInactiveDestinations is
This problem will almost certainly prevent us upgrading to 5.8.0.
On 25 February 2013 11:55, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
5.9.0 is typically a few months away, but we have a few osgi related issues
with 5.8.0 so I think we will need to do a 5.8.1 towards the end of march
or early
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:28 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Got a weird one. We have a series of queues
We have observed this when the link between A B is slow. Probably a
different scenario to the one Mohit is describing though.
In our case we had a hub behind a shared ADSL link and several spokes in
production land. We would see messages piling up at random on the spokes
until restarts where
That's not annoying...
jmkgreen all the same.
On 19 December 2012 16:43, Christian Posta christian.po...@gmail.comwrote:
James, I believe you have to create it for the wiki (not linked through
Crowd)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:39 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
My JIRA
Speaking of which I am listed under the Unlisted CLAs and have been for
months. I also wanted to update the wiki. Still can of course if someone
adds me in.
James
On 18 December 2012 10:20, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi Neil,
you need to sign ICLA
You missed the conf/activemq-stomp.xml example.
Christian's kindly copied the entry it seems :)
On 7 December 2012 18:24, rischfre risch...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi,
i m a bit surprise by the lack of documentation about Stomp instalation. In
my case it would be interresant as after installing
I have a stomp client connected using pretty much default settings, and I
changed it to ack every 100 messages for performance.
It gets one message then gives up.
Checking the Active Consumers for the queue I two entries:
A client-id, with a prefetch of 1
A connection-id, with a prefetch of 0
://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:57 PM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
If I try and send a large, multi-megabyte (base64 encoded), message to a
queue my script issues the following notice then hangs consuming all
available CPU:
Notice: fwrite(): send
, see http://activemq.apache.org/rest.html
On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:03, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to whip up a quick script to test performance.
It would be really useful to call a URI to purge/delete the queue I'm
using
between iterations without needing to manually
Sharma gaurav.cs.sha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, see http://activemq.apache.org/rest.html
On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:03, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to whip up a quick script to test performance.
It would be really useful to call a URI to purge/delete the queue I'm
If I try and send a large, multi-megabyte (base64 encoded), message to a
queue my script issues the following notice then hangs consuming all
available CPU:
Notice: fwrite(): send of 8192 bytes failed with errno=104 Connection reset
by peer in /home/jamesg/Stomp.php on line 495
Is this library
.
If the memory limits allow, on the send, the message will be retained
in memory and dispatched from memory.
It would be great to get a handle on why the stomp clients on the spoke
die?
is it inactivity timeout?
On 8 November 2012 10:01, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We
to reproduce the problem
so that it can be analyzed further.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:20 PM, James Green wrote:
I restarted AMQ. The counter remains at 55. Browsing, I now see messages!
They are 40 minutes old and have
I restarted AMQ. The counter remains at 55. Browsing, I now see messages!
They are 40 minutes old and have redelivery true. Is there anything more
that can be suggested as a result?
On 2 November 2012 15:14, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking at the web console
Are you referring to this discussion, had only days ago?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users/201210.mbox/%3ccamh6+azsejinb8zadd5_vyo0u_9y-42uyg+7yc6to7zt+k5...@mail.gmail.com%3E
On 31 October 2012 23:45, Geurt Schimmel gschim...@schubergphilis.comwrote:
BrokerA is
Message-
From: James Green [mailto:james.mk.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 8:35 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelisting forwarded queues
Are you referring to this discussion, had only days ago?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users
closed
and that the write needs to timeout at the tcp level. that can take
some time.
There is a writeTimeout filter that can help at the activemq level.
Have a peek at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1993
On 30 October 2012 21:31, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote
been initiated.
Or is the problem that the hub/spoke does not really close the
connection when it sees a problem?
It is odd that it is a 24hr thing, what happens at that time.
On 1 November 2012 11:27, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Having implemented queue and destination
that listens for stomp connections on port
61612 is the above, and it's waiting on... something?
Having to restart again! What's the best way forward here, anyone?
Thanks again,
James
On 1 November 2012 12:18, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Gary,
Spokes reach out to the hub. The hub
, it will
just ignore it and log the message you see below. This is by design, at the
moment.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:59 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Given:
networkConnectors
networkConnector uri=static://(ssl://hub:61617)
name
that
is in this class:
org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportLogger
Can you try with the following settings
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportLogger=TRACE, stomp
to get the logging you want?
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote
On 30 October 2012 09:10, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Part of my intention of declaring excluded destinations was to reduce the
amount of traffic over the ADSL line that exists between hub and the
spokes.
However, despite the instruction to ban messaging
We are running 5.7.0 on hub and spokes, forgot to mention.
On 30 October 2012 12:08, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Gary,
I think you're saying that subscription advisories for excluded
destinations should be suppressed.
On the hub we're seeing advisories for queues
to be what you want.
On 30 October 2012 12:08, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Gary,
I think you're saying that subscription advisories for excluded
destinations should be suppressed.
On the hub we're seeing advisories for queues on that spoke. Is there
therefore a bug
, the
corresponding advisory destinations will be subscribed to
automatically.
On 30 October 2012 12:40, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html states for
dynamicallyIncludedDestinations that destinations that match this list
://10.0.0.117:61616?trace=true)
On 30 October 2012 14:39, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Gary,
On our test cluster one of our spokes has been configured thus:
networkConnectors
networkConnector uri=static://(tcp://10.0.0.117:61616)
name
:32, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hub with three spokes. The network between the hub and one of these spokes
seems to be dying irregularly yet frequently.
I managed to get a thread dump of the hub's ssl connector to this spoke
along with the thread it was waiting on:
http
Interesting I think I'm seeing the same with the web console on 5.7.0.
I have a queue that's constantly got a Number of Pending Messages count
of 4. Yet the consumer is processing messages quite happily and is often
waiting for new messages. The Dequeued count is occassionally rising.
I am
://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:32 PM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We have three remote ActiveMQ installs each connecting to a central hub.
Each remote ActiveMQ install creates queues dynamically, one per customer
account, named Outbound.Account.X
Someone should really add that the message store be isolated from host
machine's filesystem activities within the installation documentation.
Anti-virus software is the most obvious example.
I cannot see it mentioned here:
http://activemq.apache.org/getting-started.html
On 3 April 2012 18:26,
Looking at ways to connect an fluctuating list of clients at customer sites
to our ActiveMQ network of brokers. They all require anything going over
the Internet to be SSL-encrypted.
I really don't want to have to restart our brokers when a new customer
comes on board (several per week). Is there
Hi,
Just noticed that 5.5.1 has been released (I'm clearly observant!).
However, there's been no news on the front page since April?
Did someone forget an announcement? I notice it's a licensing issue so you
might not feel it as important perhaps.
James
Sounds like one for Apache Camel (using ActiveMQ).
Camel to poll a filesystem directory (possibly) to shift the files onto a
queue. At the other end another Camel route to take from the queue and
place into another filesystem directory.
James
On 15 November 2011 15:21, Larry Meadors
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
The experts in open source integration and messaging -
http://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:56 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
Hi,
The network connector is documented with tcp:// transport. Are there others?
For instance, imagine I want to install a broker that is behind a
customer's firewall, and connect it to a production network of brokers.
HTTP/S might be allowed by the customer for outbound connections but
nothing
://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:50 PM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
The network connector is documented with tcp:// transport. Are there
others?
For instance, imagine I want
in open source integration and messaging -
http://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just to be clear, we could ship software containing an embedded
This is of interest to me too.
Could use a description of it's behaviour which that page does not provide.
James
On 8 November 2011 01:45, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com wrote:
... is this any good? I keep getting folks in the backseat making
tunneling over HTTP a meta-requirement. Are
stopped using the
gcInactiveDestinations feature, but of course this is not a real
solution.
I don't think that it is related to STOMP, because we have only been
using OpenWire, via the Java and C++ libraries.
Best regards,
Martin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:55 PM, James Green james.mk.gr
In 5.5.0 with gcInactiveDestinations=true, we've been sending messages via
STOMP with a receipt (proven in the stomp.log).
Just occassionally, the message appears to go missing, as does the queue
itself. The message is set to persist and has an expiry of several days.
Is this an issue that's
I'm looking at http://activemq.apache.org/statisticsplugin.html
It tells me the output includes a 'size' number. Is that the number of
messages held, the number of topics and queues, or what?
Going to try and put together a Cacti template using R.I.Pienaar's ruby
script and want the labels to be
2011 09:56, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking at http://activemq.apache.org/statisticsplugin.html
It tells me the output includes a 'size' number. Is that the number of
messages held, the number of topics and queues, or what?
Going to try and put together a Cacti template
I am looking to monitor (and alert on) ActiveMQ and it's use (queue sizes,
etc).
Checking Google first I only see something called AMon as a possibility. Is
there any planned support for SNMP metrics within ActiveMQ natively?
AMon itself looks promising yet is advertised as both free and needing
On 4 October 2011 11:02, Torsten Mielke tors...@fusesource.com wrote:
This means that for each individual queue/topic the memory limit is 1MB.
What exactly happens when this 1MB is hit, does the queue block or does
it
page to disc?
When the 1MB limit is hit, producer flow control kicks
://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:16 PM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
We have a PHP (STOMP-connected) application that has just read 977 small
packets from one queue (A), processed
We have a PHP (STOMP-connected) application that has just read 977 small
packets from one queue (A), processed them, and sent 977 similar messages to
a new queue (B).
Except the broker tells me the queue (B) has 884 messages. There is nothing
dequeuing messages on queue (B).
This has occurred on
http://camel.apache.org/xmpp.html
On 27 July 2011 14:33, mcamnadur mcamna...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean via camel?
thanks and sorry to bother you
FWIW I was able to get messages from AMQ to an XMPP user via Camel. I have
not tried using the AMQ XMPP transport directly.
On 22 July 2011 19:18, mcamnadur mcamna...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
Will try it out
Michael
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Stan Lewis [via ActiveMQ]
What does schedulePeriodForDestinationPurge=0 do precisely?
On 14 July 2011 11:30, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
That looks like a memory leak. There is a potential issue with
inactive destination deletion that has been resolved on trunk that can
be worked around by setting
I'm looking for a decent way of managing ActiveMQ, particularly since I'm
now starting to make use of Camel.
This leads me closer to a full Java EE container which might manage it
all.
I've seen ServiceMix which seems ok. What others are there and can the
community make any recomendations at
, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
How convinced are you?
I'm minded to file this as a seperate bug given the heap exceptions being
thrown and the Stomp connectivity that dies completely. What is not
explained in the bug report you list are the other effects of the bug
Timothy
/activemq/data/activemq.pid' (pid '26049')
INFO: Loading '/etc/default/activemq'
INFO: Using java '/usr/bin/java'
ActiveMQ is running (pid '26049')
On 11 July 2011 09:28, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Gary,
This occurred over the weekend again. Given we didn't have customers
Trying to get XMPP to work. Can connect but am told Invalid username or
password.
I don't currently have any authentication set up except the system / manager
set that AMQ ships with for JMX purposes. Stomp connections require no
username/password.
Right now all we want to do is see it working.
Is ActiveMQ to be discontinued in favour of this in the future?
On 7 July 2011 16:26, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
The Apache ActiveMQ Project is pleased to announce the availability of
Apollo 1.0 Beta 4. ActiveMQ Apollo is a faster, more reliable, easier
to maintain messaging
, 2011 at 11:29 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is ActiveMQ to be discontinued in favour of this in the future?
On 7 July 2011 16:26, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
The Apache ActiveMQ Project is pleased to announce the availability of
Apollo 1.0 Beta 4
into it further.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Trying to get XMPP to work. Can connect but am told Invalid username or
password.
I don't currently have any authentication set up except the system /
manager
set that AMQ ships with for JMX purposes
Getting these:
2011-07-03 07:41:54,330 | INFO | Transport failed: java.io.EOFException |
org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | ActiveMQ
Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:53546
2011-07-03 07:49:05,893 | INFO | Transport failed: java.io.EOFException |
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
