Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.14.0.0 RC3

2020-06-03 Thread Wesley Peng
Andrija Panic wrote: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/upgrading/upgrade/upgrade-4.13.html#time-zone-requirements handled in the Upgrade docs - exactly the same.. [OT] is there a cloudstack private IAAS deployment solution? not that large scale, most for storage. if there is the

Re: Unable to start agent: Failed to get private nic name

2020-06-03 Thread Practical XenServer
FYI: There are three different interfaces configured/enabled/functioning on this host: 1 active-passive bonded interface [172.16.0.1/24] consisting of two slaves (p1p3 & p1p4). 2 physical interfaces (p1p1 [172.16.1.3/25] & p1p2 [172.16.1.131/25]). During the /usr/bin/cloudstack-setup process,

Re: Unable to start agent: Failed to get private nic name

2020-06-03 Thread Practical XenServer
Thanks, Fariborz. But you're pointing me to the same page that I referenced in my original message i.e., /en/latest/installguide/hypervisor/kvm.html = /en/4.6/hypervisor/kvm.html Do you have any *new* information to share? TIA, Eric P. On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:27 PM Fariborz Navidan wrote:

Re: Unable to start agent: Failed to get private nic name

2020-06-03 Thread Fariborz Navidan
Hello, This happens when bridges are not configured on the host and there is no private ip assigned to your nic. Please check your bridge config as mentions in installation documentation here: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.6/hypervisor/kvm.html On Thu,

Unable to start agent: Failed to get private nic name

2020-06-03 Thread Practical XenServer
Hello! I've been following the installation instructions for installing the CloudStack agent on a CentOS-7 KVM host : But I can't get the cloudstack-agent to start. e.g., From the end of

Using public IP range for shared guest network in advanced zone

2020-06-03 Thread Fariborz Navidan
Hello, I am running CS 4.14. I have created an advanced zone without security groups enabled. It forced me to create public IP range which is the only available IP block in this rack assigned by datacenter. Now I'm not able to create shared guest network with that IP range. Is it somehow possible

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.14.0.0 RC3

2020-06-03 Thread Andrija Panic
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/upgrading/upgrade/upgrade-4.13.html#time-zone-requirements handled in the Upgrade docs - exactly the same.. Best, Andrija On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > I know that the VOTE has passed, but I would like to add an

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.14.0.0 RC3

2020-06-03 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
I know that the VOTE has passed, but I would like to add an answer addressing the Liridon issue regarding DB failing to start due to time zone. In such case, CloudStack fails to connect DB and therefore it does not start. Message regarding time zone value: Caused by:

Re: [DISCUSS] New default template

2020-06-03 Thread Andrija Panic
Whatever is a choosen as the new one, needs to be compatible with ALL the current hypervisor we support (i. e. VMware 6.0 and up, XenServer 7.0 and up and KVM of various flavours). So that needs to be taken into consideration when speaking about exotic OS-es or even the newest ones (Ubuntu

Re: [DISCUSS] New default template

2020-06-03 Thread nux
Hi, I'd like to restate my previous stance on this which is - if not to have a proper "market place" of trusted and tested templates - at least to cover the popular ones. The basics imho would be CentOS and Ubuntu, with this we cover 99% of the user requirements. I'd propose to go with the

Re: [DISCUSS] New default template

2020-06-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
We've discussed this in the past: https://markmail.org/message/lp5pjholfxrqhful https://markmail.org/message/mkoasohxr5vwyt3l We probably want both CentOS and Ubuntu based built-in (or default user) templates, and some people may even prefer Debian, Fedora or even FreeBSD. I think it would

[DISCUSS] New default template

2020-06-03 Thread Abhishek Kumar
Hi all, I would like to hear everyone's opinion on a new default template in CloudStack. Currently, we are using CentOS 5.x for different hypervisors but it is quite old(already completed its support life) and either the support for it has been removed

OVS related questions

2020-06-03 Thread Po Dragonwarrior
Hi all, I am trying oenvswitch with ACS and I have some questions: 1. The “OpenVswitch Network Example” section inhttp://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/installguide/hypervisor/kvm.html#kvm-installation-overview