Re: Cloudstack Mgnt Server got stuck

n you send the full log? --- Nux! www.nux.ro On 2022-03-10 16:10, Ricardo Pertuz wrote: > Hi team, > > After an energy failure, the database rebooted and I’m getting this > log in Mgnt Server > > DEBUG [c.c.u.d.VersionDaoImpl] (main:nu

Cloudstack Mgnt Server got stuck

Hi team, After an energy failure, the database rebooted and I’m getting this log in Mgnt Server DEBUG [c.c.u.d.VersionDaoImpl] (main:null) (logid:) Checking to see if the database is at a version before it was the version table is created It got stuck without showing a new message, is it

Re: KVM Host Disconnects from Management server

What if you try connection using wireguard for interconnection?, it's lighter with low payload BR, RP On 4/03/22, 1:56 PM, "Antoine Boucher" wrote: Any one? Killing the Java processes does not recover from the situation. The Java processes end-up restarting and using 100% of all

Autoscaling on KVM

Hi guys, Is there an issue or PR I can watch regarding the Autoscaling on KVM? Regards

Re: microvm support

Cool Antoine, also evaluation Kata Container, not sure if I can integrate with CS Regards From: Antoine Boucher Date: Thursday, 3 March 2022, 9:20 AM To: users , Ricardo Pertuz Subject: Re: microvm support Hi Ricardo, I’m also interested in this topic as opposed to lxc Regards, Antoine

microvm support

Hi, Is there a way to deploy microvm (firecracker approach) using qemu on Cloudstack? As explained in this link https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/system/i386/microvm.html Regards,

Re: Procedure to remove management server

. You can manually remove by updating cloud.mshost table (using below sql) for that management server host. UPDATE cloud.mshost SET state='Down', removed=NOW() WHERE id= Regards, Suresh On 02/03/22, 4:26 AM, "Ricardo Pertuz" wrote: Hi, What is the best option to remove

Procedure to remove management server

Hi, What is the best option to remove management servers from webui not longer used? Thanks! Regards

Re: dashboard cpu

For me it depends on where you have the overprovisioning configured, is it global settings? Then as Wei stated is not showed but if you configure it in the cluster setting then it will show. R P From: vas...@gmx.de Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 5:02:40 AM To:

Re: reusing same IP on VM

2 at 16:59, Ricardo Pertuz wrote: > Thanks Wei, > > I removed the record and reload the daemon, it took the new mac but not > working yet > > /etc/dhcphosts.txt file has the correct mac address > > 02:00:21:4a:00:12,10.140.60.10,hostname,infi

Re: reusing same IP on VM

Hi Ricardo, You can remove the wrong record in /etc/dhcphosts.txt in VR and run `systemctl reload dnsmasq`. PS; could you please give more info, e.g. cloudstack version, hypervisor, etc. -Wei On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 16:05, Ricardo Pertuz wrote: > The dnsm

Re: reusing same IP on VM

The dnsmasq lease has multiple entries for the same IP 0 02:00:18:4a:00:08 10.140.60.10 * * 0 02:00:5a:27:00:04 10.140.60.10 * * Do you guys know, how do I automate the clean or update? On 10/02/22, 9:52 AM, "Ricardo Pertuz" wrote: Hi team, I have a instance with a

reusing same IP on VM

Hi team, I have a instance with a certain IP and when delete it and recreate it with the same IP, the network access is lost I have hypervisors which exchange vxlan info via bgp and it is working properly and getting updates accordingly however when I check the VR arp table it got the

Re: Cloudstack community repo - unable to download binaries

klists", etc..). Regards, Gabriel. On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 5:05 PM Ricardo Pertuz wrote: > Hi team, > > > > http://download.cloudstack.org has been blocked in many locations and I > haven’t been able to download binaries. Check: > > > > > https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a185.27.174.49=toolpage > > > >

Cloudstack community repo - unable to download binaries

Hi team, http://download.cloudstack.org has been blocked in many locations and I haven’t been able to download binaries. Check: https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a185.27.174.49=toolpage [cid:image001.png@01D81C12.80728ED0]

Re: Connect 2 VPC with private gateway

subnet. Set the IP address of the peer private gateway as the gateway address of the current private gateway and vice versa. On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:48 AM Ricardo Pertuz wrote: > Thanks for replying Harikrishna . > > However I'd like to do it privately using private gatewa

Re: Connect 2 VPC with private gateway

with gw 10.0.0.2 in VPC 2: 10.0.0.2 with gw 10.0.0.1 (4) Add static routes in private gateways in VPC 1: cidr of VPC 2 in VPC 2: cidr of VPC 1 When all are configured, the vms in a VPC should be able to connect to vms in another VPC. -Wei On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 17:25, Ricardo Pertuz wrote: >

Re: Connect 2 VPC with private gateway

-in-cloudstack/ Regards, Harikrishna From: Ricardo Pertuz Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2022 9:55 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Connect 2 VPC with private gateway Hi, Is there a tutorial or doc with the steps to connect VPCs from different accounts using

Connect 2 VPC with private gateway

Hi, Is there a tutorial or doc with the steps to connect VPCs from different accounts using private gateways? Regards

Re: apache2 on VR SIGTERM

Any thoughts what can be? On 18/01/22, 4:24 PM, "Ricardo Pertuz" wrote: Also seems to be configuration error when I tried to restart it manually Jan 18 21:16:06 r-102-VM systemd[1]: Starting The Apache HTTP Server... Jan 18 21:16:06 r-102-VM apachectl[20959]: AH005

Re: apache2 on VR SIGTERM

Regards, Ricardo From: Ricardo Pertuz Date: Tuesday, 18 January 2022, 4:15 PM To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: apache2 on VR SIGTERM Hi guys, The Apache2 on some VRs is reporting offline, after seeing the error trace I found this [mpm_event:notice] [pid 2108:tid 14005

apache2 on VR SIGTERM

Hi guys, The Apache2 on some VRs is reporting offline, after seeing the error trace I found this [mpm_event:notice] [pid 2108:tid 140052633764992] AH00491: caught SIGTERM, shutting down I was thinking in increasing on the VR offering capacity as it has the default one, but not sure it is the

Re: cloudstack api is not filtering project or account in usagerecord

Thanks Wei, Please follow the issue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5860 Regards, Ricardo On 13/01/22, 3:01 PM, "Wei ZHOU" wrote: Hi Ricardo, It looks like a bug. Can you please create an issue on github ? -Wei On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 18:07, Rica

Re: cloudstack api is not filtering project or account in usagerecord

Hi Wei, Thanks for replying, effectively you are right, even though the command is " list usagerecords projectid=408271ae-fa1c-44e3-b8d7-50f7dab3100c" but all projects come out in the response. Regards, Ricardo Pertuz On 13/01/22, 11:12 AM, "Wei ZHOU" wrote:

Re: cloudstack api is not filtering project or account in usagerecord

Hi team, Any thoughts about it? Anyone knows what is going on here? Thanks! On 13/01/22, 3:23 AM, "Ricardo Pertuz" wrote: Hi guys, When I try to filter the record usage of a project, nothing is happening. It brings me all records for the date from all projects, am I doing

cloudstack api is not filtering project or account in usagerecord

Hi guys, When I try to filter the record usage of a project, nothing is happening. It brings me all records for the date from all projects, am I doing something wrong? Please follow this example with a filter to filter project names in the output. list usagerecords

Errors in CSK - cloud-controller-manager

Hi team, I’m getting this error on the cloud-controller-manager pod, E0104 15:53:17.586548 1 node_controller.go:245] Error getting node addresses for node "k1-control-17e2206df94": error fetching node by provider ID: error retrieving node addresses: CloudStack API error 401

<    1   2