If you only have local storage, then Host HA may make sense, at least if
the hypervisor crashes have it rebooted via ipmi.
Test it and see if it behaves as expected.
On 2023-10-05 10:35, Granwille Strauss wrote:
I am idiot, that makes sense, yes. Thank you.
On 10/5/23 11:15, Nux wrote:
I am idiot, that makes sense, yes. Thank you.
On 10/5/23 11:15, Nux wrote:
Hello,
"By definition" you cannot have VM HA with local storage.
If your hypervisor goes down, through what process will the storage of
your VM be moved to another hypervisor and started there?
For VM HA you always
Hello,
"By definition" you cannot have VM HA with local storage.
If your hypervisor goes down, through what process will the storage of
your VM be moved to another hypervisor and started there?
For VM HA you always must have network/shared storage, be it CEPH,
Storpool, Linbit etc - and
Hi Nux
So we cannot run VM Ha on strict KVM local storage? Or can we keep this
configuration of local storage and set up a temp NFS Primary storage
just for the hearbeat process to work?
On 10/4/23 15:36, Nux wrote:
I would avoid using host HA, I am not sure it can be relied upon
currently
I would avoid using host HA, I am not sure it can be relied upon
currently and one thing I know for sure is that it breaks VM HA.
I would just rely on the VM HA feature and disable host HA altogether.
Do note, VM HA requires an NFS storage for the hearbeat etc and it needs
to be stable
Hi Boris,
Thank you, will check ෞഀ䴀椀琀 昀爀攀甀渀搀氀椀挀栀攀渀 䜀爀ﰀßen / With kind regards
Wilken Verleger
proIO GmbH
Kleyerstr. 79 - 89 / Tor 13
D-60326 Frankfurt am Main
- Support -
Mail: supp...@proio.com
24h: +(49) (0) 1805 522 855
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Boris
