aster between
> the hosts and the NAS?MikeSent from my Galaxy
> Original message From: Pierre Le Fevre
> Date: 4/28/23 1:46 AM (GMT-08:00) To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Using NFS as primary storage, performance issues Hi all,We're
> working on up
- Original message From: Pierre Le Fevre Date:
4/28/23 1:46 AM (GMT-08:00) To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Using
NFS as primary storage, performance issues Hi all,We're working on upgrading
our storage solution to a proper networkattached storage.Before this, we had an
NFS sha
Hi,
Op 28/04/2023 om 10:45 schreef Pierre Le Fevre:
Hi all,
We're working on upgrading our storage solution to a proper network
attached storage.
Before this, we had an NFS share on some mounted disks on the management
server. Our new setup is a NAS running TrueNAS (zfs) with 64 GB ram and
Just enjoying the subject, I'm curious about what we can reach in disk
performance when using NFS primary storage. We have two infrastructures
with different purposes, one to instantiate normal VMs and other to be used
by VMs involved with scientific researches running simulations, AI
training,
Big thanks for all the suggestions :)
We've ordered some NVME SSDs for write caching, this is something we missed
when setting up the machine originally.
Sounds like the setup should work other than that.
Best,
Pierre
kthcloud
On Mon, 1 May 2023 at 17:55, wrote:
> Me use flat network and
Me use flat network and jumbo frame too.
El 29 de abr. de 2023 15:47 -0300, S.Fuller , escribió:
> Anything else different about the setup? Interface speeds? Routed vs flat
> network? MTU size being used by the network interfaces perhaps?
>
> - Steve
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 3:47 AM Pierre Le
-
From: Pierre Le Fevre
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 4:46 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Using NFS as primary storage, performance issues
Hi all,
We're working on upgrading our storage solution to a proper network attached
storage.
Before this, we had an NFS share on some mounted disks
Anything else different about the setup? Interface speeds? Routed vs flat
network? MTU size being used by the network interfaces perhaps?
- Steve
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 3:47 AM Pierre Le Fevre wrote:
> Hi all,
> We're working on upgrading our storage solution to a proper network
> attached
Hi Pierre,
In the past we try a similar solution than you to increase the
realiability of storages using ZFS (in our case was ubuntu). ZFS borns
to be safe, so when you write a block the system don't write other
block until this block confirms that is ok, so it slow.
In our case, we can
Hi all,
We're working on upgrading our storage solution to a proper network
attached storage.
Before this, we had an NFS share on some mounted disks on the management
server. Our new setup is a NAS running TrueNAS (zfs) with 64 GB ram and
8x8TB, 7200 rpm hard disks mounted to cloudstack over NFS.
10 matches
Mail list logo