[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Delayed first monitoring

Miloš Kozák milos.ko...@lejmr.com schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 09:56 in Nachricht 55cc4daa.4020...@lejmr.com: Dne 13.8.2015 v 09:26 Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák milos.ko...@lejmr.com wrote: However, this does not make sense at all. Presumably, the

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Ordering constraint restart second resource group

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: And what exactly is your problem? Real life example. Database resource depends on storage resource(s). There are multiple filesystems/volumes with database files. Database admin needs to increase available

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Ordering constraint restart second resource group

Andrei Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 11:33 in Nachricht CAA91j0WaYcPPNCtMZnwDz4_QDFWgxPrO6DbB=ga3bv+_ooo...@mail.gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: And what exactly is your problem? Real life example.

[ClusterLabs] stonithd: stonith_choose_peer: Couldn't find anyone to fence node with any

Hi, Brief description of the STONITH problem: I see two different behaviors with two different STONITH configurations. If Pacemaker cannot find a device that can STONITH a problematic node, the node remains up and running. Which is bad, because it must be STONITHed. As opposite to it, if

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Delayed first monitoring

On 13/08/15 10:38 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: Miloš Kozák milos.ko...@lejmr.com schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 09:56 in Nachricht 55cc4daa.4020...@lejmr.com: Dne 13.8.2015 v 09:26 Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák milos.ko...@lejmr.com wrote: However,

Re: [ClusterLabs] implementation of fence and stonith agents for pacemaker

Digimer, Thank you. I will try this out. One more question. What about directories for those agents, what rules are here? Thank you, Kostya On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote: On 11/08/15 11:17 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote: Hi guys, Is there any

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd: stonith_choose_peer: Couldn't find anyone to fence node with any

Then make sure it can be stonithd. Add additional stonith agent using independent communication channel. Not possible. Only one node up and running in the cluster and I am wondering - can it STONITH itself? Because most likely, after reboot, the problem can be gone. I have no idea what

[ClusterLabs] question on www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/

Hi, I noticed that after moving to the new mailing list there is no more updates here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/ Can it be fixed or am I missing something? I was a convenient way of searching/reading/tracking issues. Thank you, Kostya

Re: [ClusterLabs] question on www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/

DOH! Please ignore my mail - i live in the past ;) Last mail in archive is from Jul. Stefan ___ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:

[ClusterLabs] Antw: stonithd: stonith_choose_peer: Couldn't find anyone to fence node with any

Kostiantyn Ponomarenko konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 13:39 in Nachricht caenth0fxlzwzw4jmoyk_go0w9o6e2gdd-zfdfohzrahwcgv...@mail.gmail.com: Hi, Brief description of the STONITH problem: I see two different behaviors with two different STONITH configurations.

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Delayed first monitoring

On 13/08/15 04:38 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Miloš Kozák milos.ko...@lejmr.com schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 09:56 in Nachricht 55cc4daa.4020...@lejmr.com: Dne 13.8.2015 v 09:26 Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák milos.ko...@lejmr.com wrote: However,

Re: [ClusterLabs] implementation of fence and stonith agents for pacemaker

On 13/08/15 07:54 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote: Digimer, Thank you. I will try this out. One more question. What about directories for those agents, what rules are here? Thank you, Kostya I'm not entirely sure I understand the question, sorry. What do you mean by directories for

Re: [ClusterLabs] implementation of fence and stonith agents for pacemaker

Sorry, I should be more clear. I mean the place where I must put my agent so it is visible to the cluster. For example I know that you need to put your agent into /usr/sbin/ and start its name with fence_ in order to get it visible to the cluster. So I want to know the rules, are there other

Re: [ClusterLabs] implementation of fence and stonith agents for pacemaker

Thank you for the help :-) On Aug 13, 2015 20:19, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote: Ah, yes. If it's a RHEL/CentOS machine, put it in /usr/sbin/. If it's another OS, locate fence_ipmilan and put your agent in the same directory. digimer On 13/08/15 01:03 PM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: stonithd: stonith_choose_peer: Couldn't find anyone to fence node with any

On 13 Aug 2015, at 11:36 pm, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: Kostiantyn Ponomarenko konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 13:39 in Nachricht caenth0fxlzwzw4jmoyk_go0w9o6e2gdd-zfdfohzrahwcgv...@mail.gmail.com: Hi, Brief description of the

Re: [ClusterLabs] Memory leak in crm_mon ?

-Original Message- From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:49 AM To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed users@clusterlabs.org Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Memory leak in crm_mon ? On 10 Aug 2015, at 5:33 pm,