Re: [ClusterLabs] Timeout - SBD's vs Watchdog's [SOLVED]

2015-09-15 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 09/15/2015 04:32 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > I have a situation where the watchdog provided by the hypervisor (z/VM) > is not configurable (you can't change the heartbeat via the provided > kernel module). SBD warms me about this and suggests the -T option (so > it doesn't try to change it to

Re: [ClusterLabs] EL6, cman, rrp, unicast and iptables

2015-09-15 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 15/09/15 01:01, Digimer wrote: > On 14/09/15 10:46 AM, Noel Kuntze wrote: >> >> Hello Christine, >> >> I googled a bit and some doc[1] says that TC_PRIO_INTERACTIVE maps to value >> 6, whatever that is. >> Assuming that value of 6 is the same as the "priority value", Corosync >> traffic

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: EL6, cman, rrp, unicast and iptables

2015-09-15 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Noel Kuntze schrieb am 14.09.2015 um 17:46 in Nachricht <55f6ebf0.2000...@familie-kuntze.de>: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello Ullrich, > > >> What totem does it detect network problems when there are none: >> >> # grep ringid.*FAULTY

Re: [ClusterLabs] EL6, cman, rrp, unicast and iptables

2015-09-15 Thread Digimer
On 15/09/15 12:10 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote: > > Hello Digimer, > >> So what's the final verdict on this? I followed your back and forth, and >> it sounds like corosync uses 0, so nothing else is to be done? > > Missing prioritization itself cannot be the cause of the problem. > Either some other

Re: [ClusterLabs] EL6, cman, rrp, unicast and iptables

2015-09-15 Thread Noel Kuntze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Chrstine, > There are other networking scheduling algorithms, I think. Though I > haven't looked at them in detail for years now. Maybe we should > investigate and see if there is one that might be more appropriate? I'd propose recreating

[ClusterLabs] Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: EL6, cman, rrp, unicast and iptables

2015-09-15 Thread Noel Kuntze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Ullrich, > If you send a protocol from A to B where neither A's interface nor B's > interface has any errors, and B reports a protocol error, the obvious > conclusion is that the protocol is broken. Es pecially if the protocol claims > to

[ClusterLabs] Timeout - SBD's vs Watchdog's

2015-09-15 Thread Jorge Fábregas
Hi, I've finished my tests with SBD on x86 (using the emulated 6300esb watchdog provided by qemu) but now I'm doing final tests on the target platform (s390x). I have a situation where the watchdog provided by the hypervisor (z/VM) is not configurable (you can't change the heartbeat via the

Re: [ClusterLabs] a newbie --question

2015-09-15 Thread ‪H Yavari‬ ‪
I should note this: AppY on Node A works only with AppZ on Node B, and AppY on Node C works only with AppZ on Node D.(Some hardware restrictions) Regards, From: Michael Schwartzkopff Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 13:38:59 schrieb H Yavari‬: > Hi, > Thanks for

Re: [ClusterLabs] a newbie --question

2015-09-15 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:38 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for reply. > The problem is Compute resource, the appY and appZ can't run on same Server. > > It is possible ? > Yes; set location constraint that appY cannot run on the same node as appZ (and vice versa).

Re: [ClusterLabs] a newbie --question

2015-09-15 Thread ‪H Yavari‬ ‪
Hi, Thanks a lot. But can you give me some hints about configuration? Regards, From: Andrei Borzenkov To: hyav...@rocketmail.com; Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:38 PM, 

Re: [ClusterLabs] a newbie --question

2015-09-15 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 13:38:59 schrieb H Yavari‬: > Hi, > Thanks for reply. > The problem is Compute resource, the appY and appZ can't run on same Server. > It is possible ? > Regards, As far as I understood: You have the applications Y and Z and the servers A, B, C and D. The

Re: [ClusterLabs] a newbie --question

2015-09-15 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 13:57:36 schrieb H Yavari‬: > Hi, > Thanks a lot. But can you give me some hints about configuration? http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Schwartzkopff -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49

Re: [ClusterLabs] EL6, cman, rrp, unicast and iptables

2015-09-15 Thread Digimer
On 15/09/15 03:20 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Digimer napsal(a): >> On 14/09/15 04:20 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >>> Digimer napsal(a): Hi all, Starting a new thread from the "Clustered LVM with iptables issue" thread... I've decided to review how I do networking

Re: [ClusterLabs] a newbie --question

2015-09-15 Thread Simon Lawrence
On 15/09/15 14:22, ‪H Yavari‬ ‪ wrote: Hi, I'm newbie to pacemaker. So I don't know about all features. My question : I have 4 servers, 2 servers are appY(active and standby) and 2 servers are appZ (active and standby). I want implement HA with Pacemaker, So I can do this for AppY and AppZ