On 04/22/2016 09:05 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are recurring monitor operations constrained by the batch-limit cluster
> option? I ask because I'd like to limit the number of parallel start
> and stop operations (because they are resource hungry and potentially
> take long) without
On 04/25/2016 10:23 AM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 2016-04-24 16:20, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
>> Correct, you would need to customize the RA.
>
> Well, you wouldn't because your custom RA will be overwritten by the
> next RPM update.
Correct again :)
I should have mentioned that the convention is
Hi,
Thanks for your offer. I checked this and this is a amazing solution.So I
defined two cluster :
testcluster1:App1App2resource : IP float
testcluster2:App3App4
resource : tomcat
I know that we need to grant a ticket and manage that with Booth. But I
couldn't understand how should I define
On 2016-04-24 16:20, Ken Gaillot wrote:
Correct, you would need to customize the RA.
Well, you wouldn't because your custom RA will be overwritten by the
next RPM update.
Dimitri
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:50:43PM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> The release cycle for 1.1.15 will be started soon (hopefully tomorrow)!
>
> The most prominent feature will be Klaus Wenninger's new implementation
> of event-driven alerts -- the ability to call scripts whenever
On 2016-04-21T12:50:43, Ken Gaillot wrote:
Hi all,
awesome to see such a cool new feature land! I do have some
questions/feedback though.
> The alerts section can have any number of alerts, which look like:
>
> path="/srv/pacemaker/pcmk_alert_sample.sh">
>
On 2016-04-25T12:40:31, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> As we've made good experience with MD-RAID, I really thought about having an
> MD-RAID on one node and export that RAID via iSCSI to all the nodes that need
> access. Unfortunately I cannot compare performance ahead
>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb am 25.04.2016 um 12:12 in
Nachricht
<20160425101236.gd10...@suse.de>:
> On 2016-04-25T10:10:38, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> I can't really comment on why the cLVM2 is slow (somewhat surprisingly,
>
On 2016-04-25T10:10:38, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
I can't really comment on why the cLVM2 is slow (somewhat surprisingly,
because flock is meta-data only and thus shouldn't even be affected by
cLVM2, anyway ...).
But on the subject of performance, you're
Hi,
Thanks for your offer. I checked this and this is a amazing solution.So I
defined two cluster :
testcluster1:App1App2resource : IP float
testcluster2:App3App4
resource : tomcat
I know that we need to grant a ticket and manage that with Booth. But I
couldn't understand how should I define a
Klaus Wenninger writes:
> On 04/25/2016 08:03 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
>>> In the current implementation, meta-attributes and instance attributes
>>> may also be specified within the block, in which case they
>>> override any values specified in the block when sent
On 04/25/2016 08:03 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> Ken Gaillot writes:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> The release cycle for 1.1.15 will be started soon (hopefully tomorrow)!
>>
>> The most prominent feature will be Klaus Wenninger's new implementation
>> of event-driven alerts
Ken Gaillot writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> The release cycle for 1.1.15 will be started soon (hopefully tomorrow)!
>
> The most prominent feature will be Klaus Wenninger's new implementation
> of event-driven alerts -- the ability to call scripts whenever
> interesting
13 matches
Mail list logo