Re: [ClusterLabs] dlm_controld 4.0.4 exits when crmd is fencing another node

2016-04-26 Thread David Teigland
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:57:06PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote: > The bug is caused by the missing braces in the expanded if > statement. > > Do you think we can get a new version out with this patch as the > fencing in 4.0.4 does not work properly due to this issue? Thanks for seeing that, I'll

Re: [ClusterLabs] dlm_controld 4.0.4 exits when crmd is fencing another node

2016-04-26 Thread Valentin Vidic
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 07:57:52PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Tried reverting this one and a51b2bb ("If an error occurs unlink the > lock file and exit with status 1") one-by-one and both together, the > same result. > > So problem seems to be somewhere deeper. I've got the same

[ClusterLabs] Simple clarification regarding pacemaker

2016-04-26 Thread K Aravind
Thank you for the quick responses :) I starting to understand :) One more quick question. Let's say I have a 2 node cluster with stonith-enabled=false and no quorum policy = ignore And master-max=1 Now connection between nodes went down. Now a split brain happened So now both nodes are active Now

[ClusterLabs] HA iSCSI Target on Amazon Web Services (Multi-AZ)

2016-04-26 Thread Jason A Ramsey
So, I've been struggling for about 2 weeks to cobble together the bits and bobs required to create a highly available iSCSI Target cluster in AWS. I have a Pacemaker/Corosync cluster in place using DRBD for block-level replication of the EBS volumes used as target storage between the nodes.

Re: [ClusterLabs] Monitoring action of Pacemaker resources fail because of high load on the nodes

2016-04-26 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 2016-04-26 00:58, Klaus Wenninger wrote: But what you are attempting doesn't sound entirely proprietary. So once you have something that looks like it might be useful for others as well let the community participate and free yourself from having to always take care of your private copy ;-)

Re: [ClusterLabs] Simple Clarification's regarding pacemaker

2016-04-26 Thread Digimer
On 26/04/16 08:15 AM, RaSca wrote: > Il 26/04/2016 13:39, K Aravind ha scritto: >> Hi all >> Have some doubts regarding pacemaker >> It would be of great help if you could help me out >> >> 1.Pacemaker handles split brains using quorum and stonith only right .? >> It is not a case where a

Re: [ClusterLabs] Running several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster on a node

2016-04-26 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 04/26/2016 10:49 AM, Robert Dahlem wrote: > On 26.04.2016 10:33, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > >> Is it possible to run several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker clusters >> on a node? Can a node be a member of several clusters, so they could put >> resources there? I'm sure it's doable with

Re: [ClusterLabs] Simple Clarification's regarding pacemaker

2016-04-26 Thread RaSca
Il 26/04/2016 13:39, K Aravind ha scritto: > Hi all > Have some doubts regarding pacemaker > It would be of great help if you could help me out > > 1.Pacemaker handles split brains using quorum and stonith only right .? > It is not a case where a split brain is resolved wothout the use of >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Running several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster on a node

2016-04-26 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 26. April 2016, 10:33:00 schrieb Bogdan Dobrelya: > Is it possible to run several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker clusters > on a node? Can a node be a member of several clusters, so they could put > resources there? I'm sure it's doable with separate nodes or containers, > but

Re: [ClusterLabs] Running several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster on a node

2016-04-26 Thread Robert Dahlem
On 26.04.2016 10:33, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > Is it possible to run several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker clusters > on a node? Can a node be a member of several clusters, so they could put > resources there? I'm sure it's doable with separate nodes or containers, > but that's not the case. >

[ClusterLabs] Running several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster on a node

2016-04-26 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
Is it possible to run several instances of a Corosync/Pacemaker clusters on a node? Can a node be a member of several clusters, so they could put resources there? I'm sure it's doable with separate nodes or containers, but that's not the case. My case is to separate data-critical resources, like

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker 1.1.15 - Release Candidate 1

2016-04-26 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 22/04/16 17:54 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > ClusterLabs is happy to announce the first release candidate for > Pacemaker version 1.1.15. Source code is available at: > > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.15-rc1 To check this release candidate out using

Re: [ClusterLabs] Monitoring action of Pacemaker resources fail because of high load on the nodes

2016-04-26 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 04/26/2016 06:04 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 04/25/2016 10:23 AM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote: >> On 2016-04-24 16:20, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> >>> Correct, you would need to customize the RA. >> Well, you wouldn't because your custom RA will be overwritten by the >> next RPM update. > Correct again :) >

[ClusterLabs] why and when a call of crm_attribute can be delayed ?

2016-04-26 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Hi all, I am facing a strange issue with attrd while doing some testing on a three node cluster with the pgsqlms RA [1]. pgsqld is my pgsqlms resource in the cluster. pgsql-ha is the master/slave setup on top of pgsqld. Before triggering a failure, here was the situation: * centos1: pgsql-ha