Hello Ken,
Yes, I installed the fence_sanlock and fence_sanlockd in the same directory
with corosync and pacemaker.
There is no monitor action as listed from stonith_admin --meta
--agent=fence_sanlock, and no monitor action from "crm_resource
--show-metadata=stonith:fence_sanlock", either.
So I
On 05/12/2016 04:37 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> Le Sun, 8 May 2016 16:35:25 +0200,
> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais a écrit :
>
>> Le Sat, 7 May 2016 00:27:04 +0200,
>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais a écrit :
>>
>>> Le Wed, 4 May 2016 09:55:34 -0500,
On 05/12/2016 06:21 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Firstly thanks a lot not just for working on this, but also for being
> so proactive in discussing the details. A perfect example of
> OpenStack's "Open Design" philosophy in action :-)
>
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On
On 05/12/2016 02:56 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a question regarding an RA written by myself and pacemaker
> 1.1.12-f47ea56 (SLES11 SP4):
>
> During "probe" all resources' "monitor" actions are executed (regardless of
> any ordering constraints). Therefore my RA considers a
On 05/11/2016 09:14 PM, Da Shi Cao wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm just beginning to use pacemaker+corosync as our HA solution on
> Linux, but I got stuck at the stage of configuring fencing.
>
> Pacemaker 1.1.15, Corosync Cluster Engine, version '2.3.5.46-d245', and
> sanlock 3.3.0 (built May 10
>>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 09:56 in Nachricht <5734373F.4DE :
>>> 161 :
60728>:
> Hi!
>
> I have a question regarding an RA written by myself and pacemaker
> 1.1.12-f47ea56 (SLES11 SP4):
>
> During "probe" all resources' "monitor" actions are executed (regardless of
> any
Hi Ken,
Firstly thanks a lot not just for working on this, but also for being
so proactive in discussing the details. A perfect example of
OpenStack's "Open Design" philosophy in action :-)
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 05/10/2016 02:29 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Ken Gaillot
Ulrich Windl writes:
> Should I mess with ocf_is_probe?
That's probably the easiest way forward. Quite a few RAs have solved the
problem in exactly that way (see the vmware RA for example).
Cheers,
Kristoffer
>
> Regards,
> Ulrich
>
>
>
>
Hi!
I have a question regarding an RA written by myself and pacemaker
1.1.12-f47ea56 (SLES11 SP4):
During "probe" all resources' "monitor" actions are executed (regardless of any
ordering constraints). Therefore my RA considers a parameter as invalid ("file
does not exist") (the file will be
>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb am 11.05.2016 um 16:13 in
>>> Nachricht
<20160511141305.gi...@suse.de>:
> On 2016-05-11T08:02:56, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>
>> > $ crm help Checks
>> > $ crm options help check-frequency
>> > $ crm options help
10 matches
Mail list logo