[ClusterLabs] [corosync] Virtual Synchrony Property guarantees in case of network partition

Hello, Virtual Synchrony Property - messages are delivered in agreed order and configuration changes are delivered in agreed order relative to message. What happen to this property when network is partitioned the cluster into two. Consider following scenario (which I took from one of the

Re: [ClusterLabs] mail server (postfix)

On 06/04/2016 01:02 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > I'd modify RA to support master/slave concept. I'm assuming you use a shared mail store on your imapd cluster? I want to host the storage on the same cluster with mail daemons. I want to a) stop accepting mail, b) fail-over drbd maildirs, then

Re: [ClusterLabs] Informing RAs about recovery: failed resource recovery, or any start-stop cycle?

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: >>> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment >>> variable that would be