Re: [ClusterLabs] Informing RAs about recovery: failed resource recovery, or any start-stop cycle?

2016-06-23 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> > Well, if you're OK with bending the rules like this then that's good >> > enough for me to say we should at least try it :) >> >> I still say you shouldn't only do it on

Re: [ClusterLabs] crm_resource --cleanup and cluster-recheck-interval

2016-06-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 06/15/2016 05:44 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that after recent commit which introduces staggered probes > running 'crm_resource --cleanup' (without --resource) leads to cluster > to finish recheck too long after cleanup was done. What I see: cluster > fires probes for the

Re: [ClusterLabs] Informing RAs about recovery: failed resource recovery, or any start-stop cycle?

2016-06-23 Thread Adam Spiers
Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > >> > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >>

Re: [ClusterLabs] Failover problem with dual primary drbd

2016-06-23 Thread Eric Bourguinat
Find it! I looked at /usr/lib/drbd/crm-fence-peer.sh and find my mistake when I saw that constraint is placed on hostname. hostname = ftpprod04 and ftpprod05 But I used pcmk-1 and pcmk-2 in pacemaker config... Eric Le 23/06/2016 09:14, Eric Bourguinat a écrit : My drbd config drbdadm dump

Re: [ClusterLabs] design question to DRBD

2016-06-23 Thread Lentes, Bernd
- On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:48 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote: > On 06/22/2016 04:29 PM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: >> On 06/22/2016 11:17 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >>> I'm thinking about active/active. But i think active/passive with a >>> non-cluster fs is less complicated. >>

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Few questions regarding corosync authkey

2016-06-23 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Jan Friesse schrieb am 06.06.2016 um 09:01 in >>> Nachricht <57551fc5.9000...@redhat.com>: >> Hi, >> >> Would like to understand how secure is the corosync authkey. >> As the authkey is a binary file, how is the private key saved inside the >> authkey? > > Corosync

Re: [ClusterLabs] Bundler Error while building PCSD

2016-06-23 Thread Tomas Jelinek
Dne 22.6.2016 v 13:06 Anup Halarnkar napsal(a): *OS*: RHEL 7.2* Arch*: PPC64LE* uname -a :*Linux x 3.10.0-229.ael7b.ppc64le _#1_ SMP Fri Jan 30 12:03:50 EST 2015 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux *Versions of installed ruby packages:*

Re: [ClusterLabs] Failover problem with dual primary drbd

2016-06-23 Thread Eric Bourguinat
My drbd config drbdadm dump all # /etc/drbd.conf global { usage-count yes; cmd-timeout-medium 600; cmd-timeout-long 0; } common { } # resource home on ftpprod04: not ignored, not stacked # defined at /etc/drbd.d/home.res:1 resource home { on ftpprod04 { device

[ClusterLabs] Failover problem with dual primary drbd

2016-06-23 Thread Eric Bourguinat
Hello, centos 7.2.1511 - pacemaker 1.1.13 - corosync 2.3.4 - drbd 8.4.7-1 - drbd84-utils 8.9.5 Linux ftpprod04 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 12 11:03:55 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux => pcmk-1 Linux ftpprod05 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 12 11:03:55 UTC 2016