Re: [ClusterLabs] design question to DRBD

On 06/23/2016 04:57 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > What i mean with "less complicated" is that i prefer to have everything > managed by pacemaker and not some stuff by pacemaker and some stuff by init. > This is more overseeable. I'd agree to that except I am regularly locking up

[ClusterLabs] problems with a CentOS7 SBD cluster

Hi, I'm trying to get familiar with STONITH Block Devices (SBD) on a 3-node CentOS7 built in VirtualBox. The complete setup is available at https://github.com/marcindulak/vagrant-sbd-tutorial-centos7.git so hopefully with some help I'll be able to make it work. Question 1: The shared device

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

"Lentes, Bernd" writes: > is it possible to have a DLM running without CRM? Yes. You'll need to configure fencing, though, since by default DLM will try to use stonithd (from Pacemaker). But DLM fencing didn't handle fencing failures correctly for me,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Informing RAs about recovery: failed resource recovery, or any start-stop cycle?

Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 06/24/2016 05:41 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > >>> Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > Earlier in this thread I