On 08/23/2016 11:46 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On 08/23/2016 06:26 PM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to ask for settings (and hardware requirements) to have
>> corosync/pacemaker running on about 100 nodes cluster.
> Actually I had thought that 16 would be the limit for full
Found the 2 reasons:
1) I had to use gcc 4.8 for libqb to use internal memory barries
this still did not solve the crash but changed the way it crashed the subdaemons
2) /usr/var/run is not writable to everyone, but pacemakerd subdaemons want to
create socket files here with hacluster user, and
On 08/23/2016 06:26 PM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask for settings (and hardware requirements) to have
> corosync/pacemaker running on about 100 nodes cluster.
Actually I had thought that 16 would be the limit for full
pacemaker-cluster-nodes.
For larger deployments
Thanks,
Jaspal Singla
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:42 PM, wrote:
> Send Users mailing list submissions to
> users@clusterlabs.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via
I found that pacemakerd leaves a core file where I launch it, nad here is the
output from "mdb core":
sonicle@xstorage1:/sonicle/etc/cluster/corosync# mdb core
Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
$C
08047a48 libqb.so.0.18.0`qb_thread_lock+0x16(0, feef9875, 8047a9c, fe9eb842,
fe9ff000,
About the hacluster/haclient user/group, I staft to think that cib can't
connect because it's started by pacemakerd with user hacluster, even though
pacemakerd is started as root.
Instead, just before pacemakerd is able to connect with the same call, but that
is the root user.
So I tried to run
Sure I did: created the new corosync package and installed on the dev machine
before building and creating the new pacemaker package on the dev machine.
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
Ok, looks like Corosync now runs fine with its version, but then pacemakerd
fails again with new errors on attrd and other daemons it tries to fork.
The main reason seems around ha signon and cluster process group api.
Any idea?
Gabriele
On 08/23/2016 08:31 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> 朱荣 writes:
>
>> Hello:
>> I has a problem about corosync log, my corosync log is increase to 5.1GB in
>> a short time.
>> Then I check the corosync log, it’s show me the same message in short
>> period,like the attachment.
朱荣 writes:
> Hello:
> I has a problem about corosync log, my corosync log is increase to 5.1GB in a
> short time.
> Then I check the corosync log, it’s show me the same message in short
> period,like the attachment.
> What happened about corosync? Thank you!
> my corosync
On 23/08/16 07:23 +0200, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Thanks! I am using Corosync 2.3.6 and Pacemaker 1.1.4 using the
> "--with-corosync".
> How is Corosync looking for his own version?
The situation may be as easy as building corosync from GitHub-provided
automatic tarball, which is never a good
11 matches
Mail list logo