On 09/09/2016 04:27 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 07:31 PM, Scott Greenlese wrote:
>>
>> Hi Klaus, thanks for your prompt and thoughtful feedback...
>>
>> Please see my answers nested below (sections entitled, "Scott's
>> Reply"). Thanks!
>>
>> - Scott
>>
>>
>> Scott Greenlese ... IBM
On 09/09/16 14:13 -0400, Scott Greenlese wrote:
> You had mentioned this command:
>
> pstree -p | grep -A5 $(pidof -x pcs)
>
> I'm not quite sure what the $(pidof -x pcs) represents??
This is a "command substitution" shell construct (new, blessed form
of `backtick` notation) that in this
On 09/09/2016 02:47 PM, Scott Greenlese wrote:
> Hi Ken ,
>
> Below where you commented,
>
> "It's considered good practice to stop
> pacemaker+corosync before rebooting a node intentionally (for even more
> safety, you can put the node into standby first)."
>
> .. is this something that we
Hi Ken ,
Below where you commented,
"It's considered good practice to stop
pacemaker+corosync before rebooting a node intentionally (for even more
safety, you can put the node into standby first)."
.. is this something that we document anywhere?
Our 'reboot' action performs a halt (deactivate
Poki,
Once again, I must apologize for presenting you and the users group with
some mis-information.After triple checking my
note log ... it seems that I described the two actions to you backwards, as
it was the kill, not the gentle shutdown that I had issues with,
and I had done them in the
On 09/09/2016 08:52 AM, Auer, Jens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a client asked me to describe the conditions when Pacemaker uses STONITH
> to bring the cluster into a known state. The documentation says that
> this happens when "we cannot establish with certainty a state of some
> node or resource", but I
On 09/08/2016 07:31 PM, Scott Greenlese wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus, thanks for your prompt and thoughtful feedback...
>
> Please see my answers nested below (sections entitled, "Scott's
> Reply"). Thanks!
>
> - Scott
>
>
> Scott Greenlese ... IBM Solutions Test, Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
> INTERNET:
>>> Dimitri Maziuk schrieb am 09.09.2016 um 02:17 in
Nachricht <72d90bbe-1eb8-f2d8-e7d4-43e0a19b6...@bmrb.wisc.edu>:
> On 09/08/2016 06:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
>
>> With 'fencing resource-and-stonith;' and a {un,}fence-handler set, DRBD
>> will block when the peer is lost
>>> Nurit Vilosny schrieb am 08.09.2016 um 16:44 in
>>> Nachricht
:
> Hi everyone,
> I have a very basic question that I couldn't find an answer for.
> I am using the pacemaker to control a 3