Re: [ClusterLabs] RFC: allowing soft recovery attempts before ignore/block/etc.

On 09/22/2016 05:58 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Ken Gaillot > wrote: > > On 09/22/2016 09:53 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > > On 22/09/16 08:42 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > >> Ken Gaillot

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7

On 09/23/2016 06:59 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote: >>> Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option > is not sufficient? > > Alongside with starting the cluster with two nodes I need that > possibility of starting the cluster with only one node. > "two_node" option

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7

>> Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option is not sufficient? Alongside with starting the cluster with two nodes I need that possibility of starting the cluster with only one node. "two_node" option doesn't provide that. Thank you, Kostia On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:33

Re: [ClusterLabs] kind=Optional order constraint not working at startup

Hi, > But if A can tolerate outage of B, why does it matter whether A is started > before or > after B? By the same logic it should be able to reconnect once B is up? At > least that > is what I'd expect. In our case B is the file system resource that stores the configuration file for resource