Re: [ClusterLabs] Live migration not working on shutdown

On 10/26/2016 06:12 AM, Rainer Nerb wrote: > Hello all, > > we're currently testing a 2-node-cluster with 2 vms and live migration > on CentOS 7.2 and Pacemaker 1.1.13-10 with disks on iSCSI-targets and > migration via ssh-method. > > Live migration works, if we issue "pcs resource move ...",

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker

On 11/01/2016 02:31 AM, Siwakoti, Ganesh wrote: > Hi, > > > i'm using CentOS release 6.8 (Final) as a KVM and i configured 3 > nodes(PM1.local,PM2.local and PM3.local), and using > CMAN clustering. Resources running at two nodes as Active node then > another one node is for Fail-over resource as

Re: [ClusterLabs] Which Pacemaker version is Best.

On 11/01/2016 03:17 AM, Ganesh Siwakoti wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using CentOS release 6.8 (Final) (KVM) and I want to make failover > cluster.i've 2 same nodes for clustering(both are KVM), so which version > of Pacemaker and Cman is appropriate for me? Personally, I'd stick with the packages

[ClusterLabs] What is the logic when two node are down at the same time and needs to be fenced

Hi all, I have a general question regarding the fence login in pacemaker. I have setup a three nodes cluster with Pacemaker 1.1.13 and cluster property no_quorum_policy set to ignore. When two nodes lost their NIC corosync is running on at the same time, it looks like the two nodes are