Hi all..
Over the past few days, I noticed that pcsd and ruby process is pegged at
99% CPU, and commands such as
pcs status pcsd take up to 5 minutes to complete. On all active cluster
nodes, top shows:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHRS %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND
27225
Ken,
Thanks for the explanation.
One other thing, relating to the iface-bridge resource creation. I
specified --disabled flag:
> [root@zs95kj VD]# date;pcs resource create br0_r1
> ocf:heartbeat:iface-bridge bridge_name=br0 bridge_slaves=vlan1292 op
> monitor timeout="20s" interval="10s"
(Apologies if this is a duplicate. I accidentally posted to the old
linux-ha.org address, and I couldn't tell from the auto-reply whether my
message was actually posted to the list or not).
For the second time in a few weeks, we have had one node of a particular
cluster getting fenced. It isn't
Hi,
This is now complete and pushes to the old Fedora Hosted git repository
should no longer work. Please update your gfs2-utils trees as below.
Thanks,
Andy
On 31/01/17 15:15, Andrew Price wrote:
Hi,
This is a heads-up that from Friday February 3 the gfs2-utils git
repository will be
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:45:18 -0600
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 12:33 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > On 02/02/2017 12:23 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> By the next correction, the user was not able to set a value except zero
> >> in
On 02/02/2017 12:33 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 12:23 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> By the next correction, the user was not able to set a value except zero in
>> crm_failcount.
>>
>> - [Fix: tools: implement crm_failcount command-line options correctly]
>>
Hello I am completing a proof of concept.
Here are the facts:
An active / passive cluster.Done
A drbd partition for exchanging files for different servicesDone
A shared VIP between the two nodesDone
The docker/containers are functional. I do not want to use docker swarm.
This is not
On 03/02/2017 11:06, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Ken Gaillot writes:
>
>> On 01/10/2017 04:24 AM, Stefan Schloesser wrote:
>>
>>> I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu 16.04. The setup
>>> seems to be working ok including the STONITH.
>>> For test purposes I
Ken Gaillot writes:
> On 01/10/2017 04:24 AM, Stefan Schloesser wrote:
>
>> I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu 16.04. The setup
>> seems to be working ok including the STONITH.
>> For test purposes I issued a "pkill -f pace" killing all pacemaker
>>