Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Running two independent clusters

I simplified when I called it as a service. Essentially it is a complete system. It is an LTE eNB solution. It provides LTE service (service A) and now we need to provide redundancy for another different but related service (service B). The catch being, the LTE redundancy solution will be tied to

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Running two independent clusters

I need 2 clusters to be running independently of each other on same node. -Nikhil On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Ulrich Windl < ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >>> Nikhil Utane schrieb am 22.03.2017 um > 11:23 in > Nachricht >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: CIB configuration: role with many expressions - error 203

Thanks, just found that out as well. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 03/22/2017 09:26 AM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote: > > I have tried also as 'boolean_op', sorry did not mention this in the > > original post (just as a remark the documentation for

[ClusterLabs] [Announce] clufter v0.70.0 released

I am happy to announce that clufter, a tool/library for transforming and analyzing cluster configuration formats, got its version 0.70.0 tagged and released (incl. signature using my 60BCBB4F5CD7F9EF key):

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Running two independent clusters

On 03/22/2017 05:23 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > > It's not an option unfortunately. > Our product runs on a specialized hardware and provides both the > services (A & B) that I am referring to. Hence I cannot have service A > running on some nodes as cluster A and service B running on

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: CIB configuration: role with many expressions - error 203

I have tried also as 'boolean_op', sorry did not mention this in the original post (just as a remark the documentation for pacemaker has both forms). To make it work I have to remove additional "" and leave only one. To summarize: - having no "boolean..." attribute and a single "expression" -

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Running two independent clusters

>>> Nikhil Utane schrieb am 22.03.2017 um 11:23 in Nachricht : > Hi Ulrich, > > It's not an option unfortunately. > Our product runs on a specialized hardware and provides both the services > (A & B)

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Running two independent clusters

On 03/22/2017 11:23 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > > It's not an option unfortunately. > Our product runs on a specialized hardware and provides both the > services (A & B) that I am referring to. Hence I cannot have service A > running on some nodes as cluster A and service B running on

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Running two independent clusters

Hi Ulrich, It's not an option unfortunately. Our product runs on a specialized hardware and provides both the services (A & B) that I am referring to. Hence I cannot have service A running on some nodes as cluster A and service B running on other nodes as cluster B. The two services HAVE to run

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-cluster] Active/passive cluster between physical and VM

On 22/03/17 03:11 AM, Amjad Syed wrote: > Hello, > > We are planning to build a 2 node Active/passive cluster using pacemaker. > Can the cluster be build between one physical and one VM machine in > Centos 7.x? > If yes, what can be used as fencing agent ? So long as the traffic between the

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Running two independent clusters

>>> Nikhil Utane schrieb am 22.03.2017 um 07:48 in Nachricht : > Hi All, > > First of all, let me thank everyone here for providing excellent support > from the time I started evaluating this tool

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: CIB configuration: role with many expressions - error 203

>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 22.03.2017 um 00:18 in >>> Nachricht <94b7e5fd-cb65-4775-71df-ca8983629...@redhat.com>: > On 03/21/2017 11:20 AM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a problem when creating rules with many expressions: >> >> >> >

[ClusterLabs] Running two independent clusters

Hi All, First of all, let me thank everyone here for providing excellent support from the time I started evaluating this tool about a year ago. It has helped me to make a timely and good quality release of our Redundancy solution using Pacemaker & Corosync. (Three cheers :)) Now for our next