Re: [ClusterLabs] Three node cluster becomes completely fenced if one node leaves

2017-03-30 Thread Seth Reid
The original message has the logs from nodes 1 and 3. Node 2, the one that got fenced in this test, doesn't really show much. Here are the logs from it: Mar 24 16:35:10 b014 ntpd[2318]: Deleting interface #5 enp6s0f0, 192.168.100.14#123, interface stats: received=0, sent=0, dropped=0,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Running two independent clusters

2017-03-30 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 03/30/2017 01:17 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote: > "/Coincidentally, I am about to announce enhanced container support in/ > /pacemaker. I should have a post with more details later today or > tomorrow./" > > Ken: Where you able to get to it? > > -Thanks > Nikhil Not yet, we've been tweaking the

Re: [ClusterLabs] Stonith

2017-03-30 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Alexander Markov writes: > Hello, Kristoffer > >> Did you test failover through pacemaker itself? > > Yes, I did, no problems here. > >> However: Am I understanding it correctly that you have one node in each >> data center, and a stonith device in each data center? > > Yes.

Re: [ClusterLabs] question about ocf metadata actions

2017-03-30 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
he.hailo...@zte.com.cn writes: > Hi, > > > Does the timeout configured in the ocf metadata actually take effect? > > > > > ＜actions＞ > > ＜action name="start" timeout="300s" /＞ > > ＜action name="stop" timeout="200s" /＞ > > ＜action name="status" timeout="20s" /＞ > > ＜action

Re: [ClusterLabs] Stonith

2017-03-30 Thread Alexander Markov
Hello, Kristoffer Did you test failover through pacemaker itself? Yes, I did, no problems here. However: Am I understanding it correctly that you have one node in each data center, and a stonith device in each data center? Yes. If the data center is lost, the stonith device for the node

[ClusterLabs] question about ocf metadata actions

2017-03-30 Thread he.hailong5
Hi, Does the timeout configured in the ocf metadata actually take effect? ＜actions＞ ＜action name="start" timeout="300s" /＞ ＜action name="stop" timeout="200s" /＞ ＜action name="status" timeout="20s" /＞ ＜action name="monitor" depth="0" timeout="20s" interval="2s" /＞

Re: [ClusterLabs] Stonith

2017-03-30 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Alexander Markov writes: > Hello guys, > > it looks like I miss something obvious, but I just don't get what has > happened. > > I've got a number of stonith-enabled clusters within my big POWER boxes. > My stonith devices are two HMC (hardware management consoles) -

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Running two independent clusters

2017-03-30 Thread Nikhil Utane
"*Coincidentally, I am about to announce enhanced container support in* *pacemaker. I should have a post with more details later today or tomorrow.* " Ken: Where you able to get to it? -Thanks Nikhil On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 03/22/2017