Re: [ClusterLabs] Clusterlabs Summit 2017 (Nuremberg, 6-7 September) - Hotels and Topics

Kristoffer Gronlund wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Here's a quick update on the summit happening at the SUSE office in > Nuremberg on September 6-7. [snipped] > I am also happy to say that Adam Spiers from the SUSE Cloud team will be > attending the summit, and hopefully I can

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

On 05/03/2017 02:43 AM, pillai bs wrote: > Hi Experts!!! > > Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take > in-charge

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in primary node

On 05/03/2017 02:30 AM, pillai bs wrote: > Hi Experts!!! > > Am having two node HA setup (Primary/Secondary) with > separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected > behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take > in-charge (meaning

[ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in Primary Node even though its interface went down

Hi Experts!!! Am having two node setup for HA (Primary/Secondary) with separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary node, so

[ClusterLabs] Resources still retains in primary node

Hi Experts!!! Am having two node HA setup (Primary/Secondary) with separate resources for Home/data/logs/Virtual IP.. As known the Expected behavior should be , if Primary node went down, secondary has to take in-charge (meaning initially the VIP will point the primary node, so user