[ClusterLabs] CIB: op-status=4 ?

2017-05-17 Thread Radoslaw Garbacz
Hi, I have a question regarding ' 'op-status attribute getting value 4. In my case I have a strange behavior, when resources get those "monitor" operation entries in the CIB with op-status=4, and they do not seem to be called (exec-time=0). What does 'op-status' = 4 mean? I would appreciate

Re: [ClusterLabs] how to set a dedicated fence delay for a stonith agent ?

2017-05-17 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 2017-05-17 06:24, Lentes, Bernd wrote: ... I'd like to know what the software is use is doing. Am i the only one having that opinion ? No. How do you solve the problem of a deathmatch or killing the wrong node ? *I* live dangerously with fencing disabled. But then my clusters only

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker's "stonith too many failures" log is not accurate

2017-05-17 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 05/17/2017 04:56 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: > On 05/17/2017 11:28 AM, 井上 和徳 wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm testing Pacemaker-1.1.17-rc1. >> The number of failures in "Too many failures (10) to fence" log does not >> match the number of actual failures. > > Well it kind of does as after 10 failures it

Re: [ClusterLabs] how to set a dedicated fence delay for a stonith agent ?

2017-05-17 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 05/17/2017 03:33 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > - On May 17, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Klaus Wenninger kwenn...@redhat.com wrote: > > >>> I don't see that. >> fence_* are the RHCS-style fence-agents coming mainly from >> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents. >> > Ah. Ok, i see that. > > Do you

Re: [ClusterLabs] how to set a dedicated fence delay for a stonith agent ?

2017-05-17 Thread Lentes, Bernd
- On May 17, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: > 08.05.2017 22:20, Lentes, Bernd wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node >> cluster. >> E.g. here: >>

Re: [ClusterLabs] how to set a dedicated fence delay for a stonith agent ?

2017-05-17 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
08.05.2017 22:20, Lentes, Bernd wrote: Hi, i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node cluster. E.g. here: http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-July/019228.html In my eyes it makes sense, so i try to establish that. I have two HP servers, each with an

Re: [ClusterLabs] how to set a dedicated fence delay for a stonith agent ?

2017-05-17 Thread Lentes, Bernd
- On May 10, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote: > On 05/10/2017 01:54 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On 05/10/2017 12:26 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > >>> - fencing in 2-node clusters does not work reliably without fixed delay >> >> Not quite. Fixed delay allows a

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker's "stonith too many failures" log is not accurate

2017-05-17 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 05/17/2017 11:28 AM, 井上 和徳 wrote: > Hi, > I'm testing Pacemaker-1.1.17-rc1. > The number of failures in "Too many failures (10) to fence" log does not > match the number of actual failures. Well it kind of does as after 10 failures it doesn't try fencing again so that is what failures stay at