Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:41 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais < j...@dalibo.com> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:40:25 -0500 > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Andrew Beekhof brought up a potential change to help with reading > > Pacemaker logs. > > > > Currently,

Re: [ClusterLabs] symmetric-cluster=false doesn't work

Thank you for clarification! I think you're right, our last config doesn't have any problem with asymmetric work. 26.03.2018, 22:37, "Ken Gaillot" : > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 22:03 +0300, George Melikov wrote: >>  Hello, >> >>  I tried to create an asymmetric cluster via

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:40:25 -0500 Ken Gaillot wrote: > Hi all, > > Andrew Beekhof brought up a potential change to help with reading > Pacemaker logs. > > Currently, pacemaker daemon names are not intuitive, making it > difficult to search the system log or understand

[ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

Hi all, Andrew Beekhof brought up a potential change to help with reading Pacemaker logs. Currently, pacemaker daemon names are not intuitive, making it difficult to search the system log or understand what each one does. The idea is to rename the daemons, with a common prefix, and a name that

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: crm shell 2.1.2 manual bug?

28.03.2018 15:12, Ulrich Windl пишет: > > I was hoping "colocation ... ( B C D ) A" to be a shortcut of "colocation ... > B A", "colocation ... C A", "colocation ... D A"... > Well, my understanding is that "colocation { B C D } { A }" should do exactly that.

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: crm shell 2.1.2 manual bug?

>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 28.03.2018 um 12:39 in Nachricht : > 28.03.2018 13:25, Ulrich Windl пишет: >> Hi! >> >> For crmsh-2.1.2+git132.gbc9fde0-18.2 I think there's a bug in the manual > describing resource sets: >>

Re: [ClusterLabs] crm shell 2.1.2 manual bug?

"Ulrich Windl" writes: > Hi! > > For crmsh-2.1.2+git132.gbc9fde0-18.2 I think there's a bug in the manual > describing resource sets: > >sequential >If true, the resources in the set do not depend on each other > internally. Setting

Re: [ClusterLabs] crm shell 2.1.2 manual bug?

28.03.2018 13:25, Ulrich Windl пишет: > Hi! > > For crmsh-2.1.2+git132.gbc9fde0-18.2 I think there's a bug in the manual > describing resource sets: > >sequential >If true, the resources in the set do not depend on each other > internally. Setting sequential to true implies

[ClusterLabs] crm shell 2.1.2 manual bug?

Hi! For crmsh-2.1.2+git132.gbc9fde0-18.2 I think there's a bug in the manual describing resource sets: sequential If true, the resources in the set do not depend on each other internally. Setting sequential to true implies a strict order of dependency within the set.

[ClusterLabs] Antw: PSA: pvmove -i0 and LVM resource

>>> "Hayden,Robert" schrieb am 27.03.2018 um 20:12 in Nachricht : > Thought I would share an experience with the community. We have RHEL 7.4 > clusters that uses the heartbeat LVM resource (HA-LVM