[ClusterLabs] Pacemake/Corosync good fit for embedded product?

Hi, We are planning on creating a HA product in an active/standby configuration whereby the standby unit needs to take over from the active unit very fast (<50ms including all services restored). We are able to do very fast signaling (say 1000Hz) between the two units to detect failures so

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 > > Jan Pokorný wrote: > > > > > On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:08:55 +0200 Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 10/04/18 09:42 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 > >> Jan Pokorný wrote: > >>>

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

On 10/04/18 09:42 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 >> Jan Pokorný wrote: >>> On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: I won't change the systemd unit file names or 

Re: [ClusterLabs] STONITH forever?

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 07:26 +, Stefan Schlösser wrote: > Hi, >   > I have a 3 node setup on ubuntu 16.04. Corosync/Pacemaker services > are not started automatically. >   > If I put all 3 nodes to offline mode, with 1 node in an „unclean“ > state I get a never ending STONITH. >   > What

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:50 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 > Jan Pokorný wrote: > > > On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > Based on the list discussion and feedback I could coax out of > > > others, I > > > will

Re: [ClusterLabs] How to cancel a fencing request?

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:24:04 +0200 Klaus Wenninger wrote: > On 04/10/2018 08:48 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:59:26 -0500 > > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 00:02 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker's additional services for distributed applications (Was: Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons)

On 04/10/2018 11:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 06/04/18 12:24 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 06/04/18 09:09 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > The idea is to provide a more generalized key-value store that > other applications built on top of pacemaker can use. Something > like a

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker's additional services for distributed applications (Was: Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons)

On 06/04/18 12:24 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 06/04/18 09:09 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: The idea is to provide a more generalized key-value store that other applications built on top of pacemaker can use. Something like a HTTP REST API to a key-value store with

Re: [ClusterLabs] How to cancel a fencing request?

On 04/10/2018 08:48 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:59:26 -0500 > Ken Gaillot wrote: > >> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 00:02 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: >>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:35:43 -0500 >>> Ken Gaillot wrote:

[ClusterLabs] pcs 0.9.164 released

I am happy to announce the latest release of pcs, version 0.9.164. Source code is available at: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.9.164.tar.gz or https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.9.164.zip This is a security release fixing 3 CVEs, one of them is rated as Important and two

[ClusterLabs] STONITH forever?

Hi, I have a 3 node setup on ubuntu 16.04. Corosync/Pacemaker services are not started automatically. If I put all 3 nodes to offline mode, with 1 node in an "unclean" state I get a never ending STONITH. What happens is that the STONITH causes a reboot of the unclean node. 1) I would have

Re: [ClusterLabs] Possible idea for 2.0.0: renaming the Pacemaker daemons

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:54:01 +0200 Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 09/04/18 12:10 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > Based on the list discussion and feedback I could coax out of others, I > > will change the Pacemaker daemon names, including the log tags, for > > 2.0.0-rc3. > > > > I

Re: [ClusterLabs] How to cancel a fencing request?

On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:59:26 -0500 Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 00:02 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:35:43 -0500 > > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 21:46 +0200, Klaus Wenninger