Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker 2.0.0-rc3 now available

2018-04-30 Thread digimer
Dde, nicely done! Looking forward to playing with this when I get back. digimer On 2018-04-30 07:16 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: Source code for the third release candidate for Pacemaker version 2.0.0 is now available at: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-2.0.0-r

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker packagers: important information about 2.0.0

2018-04-30 Thread Ken Gaillot
Some of this has been mentioned before, but to collect it all in one location, here is information of particular interest to distribution packagers and users who build Pacemaker themselves: * Should you stay on the 1.1 series or move to 2.0? See the following list of factors to consider,

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker 2.0.0-rc3 now available

2018-04-30 Thread Ken Gaillot
Source code for the third release candidate for Pacemaker version 2.0.0 is now available at: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-2.0.0-r c3 The main feature of this release is renaming all the Pacemaker daemons to help make the documentation and logs easier to follow:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Failure of preferred node in a 2 node cluster

2018-04-30 Thread Wei Shan
Hi! Thanks for the prompt response. Due to the RedHat version, I can't use shared storage. I'm using timer-based watchdog with stonith-watchdog-timeout set to 5 seconds. On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 at 05:37, Digimer wrote: > Ah, ok, now I get it. > > So node 2 should wait until

[ClusterLabs] Corosync 3.0 - Alpha3 is available at corosync.org!

2018-04-30 Thread Jan Friesse
I am pleased to announce the second testing (Alpha 3) release of Corosync 3.0 (codename Camelback) available immediately from our website at http://build.clusterlabs.org/corosync/releases/ as corosync-2.99.2. You can also download RPMs for various distributions from CI

Re: [ClusterLabs] Failure of preferred node in a 2 node cluster

2018-04-30 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 04/30/2018 08:51 AM, Christine Caulfield wrote: > On 29/04/18 13:22, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> 29.04.2018 04:19, Wei Shan пишет: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm using Redhat Cluster Suite 7with watchdog timer based fence agent. I >>> understand this is a really bad setup but this is what the end-user

Re: [ClusterLabs] Failure of preferred node in a 2 node cluster

2018-04-30 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 29/04/18 13:22, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 29.04.2018 04:19, Wei Shan пишет: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using Redhat Cluster Suite 7with watchdog timer based fence agent. I >> understand this is a really bad setup but this is what the end-user wants. >> >> ATB => auto_tie_breaker >> >> "When the