Re: [ClusterLabs] Q: ordering clones with interleave=false

2018-08-29 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 13:30 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > Reading the docs I have a question: WHen I run a clone with > interleave=false in a three-node cluster, and the clne cannot be > started on one node, will ordering for such a clone be possible? Does > it make a difference, whether

Re: [ClusterLabs] Q: Resource Groups vs Resources for stickiness and colocation?

2018-08-29 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 18:40 +0100, Ian Underhill wrote: > im guessing this is just a "feature", but something that will > probably stop me using groups > > Scenario1 (working): > 1) Two nodes (1,2) within a cluster (default-stickiness = INFINITY) > 2) Two resources (A,B) in a cluster running on

[ClusterLabs] Q: Resource Groups vs Resources for stickiness and colocation?

2018-08-29 Thread Ian Underhill
im guessing this is just a "feature", but something that will probably stop me using groups Scenario1 (working): 1) Two nodes (1,2) within a cluster (default-stickiness = INFINITY) 2) Two resources (A,B) in a cluster running on different nodes 3) colocation constraint between resources of A->B

[ClusterLabs] Q: ordering clones with interleave=false

2018-08-29 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! Reading the docs I have a question: WHen I run a clone with interleave=false in a three-node cluster, and the clne cannot be started on one node, will ordering for such a clone be possible? Does it make a difference, whether the resource cannot run on an online node, or is unable due to a