>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 08.01.2019 um 18:28 in
Nachricht
<2ecefc63baa56a76a6eeca7c696fc7a1653eb620.ca...@redhat.com>:
> On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 17:23 +0100, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 10:07 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 10:30 +0100, Kristoffer
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 08.01.2019 um 17:55 in
Nachricht
:
> On Tue, 2019‑01‑08 at 07:35 ‑0600, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm building a two node cluster with Centos 7.6 and DRBD. These
>> nodes
>> are connected upstream to two Brocade switches. I'm trying to enable
>> fencing by
On 12/28/18 5:39 AM, digimer wrote:
On 2018-11-26 12:26 p.m., Tomas Jelinek wrote:
I am happy to announce the latest release of pcs, version 0.10.1.
Source code is available at:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.10.1.tar.gz
or
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/archive/0.10.1.zip
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:55:09AM -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> FYI pcmk_off_action="off" is the default
>
> If you want the cluster to request an "off" command instead of a
> "reboot" when fencing a node, set the stonith-action cluster property
> to "off".
Awesome! Thank you, Ken. I don't
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 17:23 +0100, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 10:07 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 10:30 +0100, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 17:52 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Having all the tools able to
> The pacemaker CLI commands don't always say anything when invalid
> option combinations are used (fixing that is one of the many things on
> the "would-be-nice" list).
If you run into a nonsense option combination, file a bug and CC me on it
and I'll take a look at it. I've been adding options
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 07:35 -0600, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building a two node cluster with Centos 7.6 and DRBD. These
> nodes
> are connected upstream to two Brocade switches. I'm trying to enable
> fencing by using Digimer's fence_dlink_snmp script (
>
Hello,
We've seen an issue in production where DLM 4.0.7 gets "stuck" and
unable to join more lockspaces. Other nodes in the cluster were able to
join new lockspaces, but not the one that node 1 was stuck on.
GFS2 was unaffected (the "stuck" lockspace was for a userspace control
daemon, but thats
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 10:07 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 10:30 +0100, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 17:52 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > >
> > Having all the tools able to produce XML output like cibadmin and
> > crm_mon would be good in general, I
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 15:27 +0800, T. Ladd Omar wrote:
> Hey guys. I have a question, if the Pacemaker has an event-notify
> interface which is realized by push Recently I want to do
> something extra using other process when the resources being started
> or deleted. So I need a way to monitor the
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 10:30 +0100, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 17:52 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > There has been some discussion in the past about generating more
> > machine-friendly output from pacemaker CLI tools for scripting and
> > high-level interfaces, as well as
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:56:18AM +0100, wf...@niif.hu wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> The DLM git repo accumulated a couple of patches over the 4.0.7 tag,
> would you mind cutting a new release for packaging?
ok
> Tangentially, would you be interested in an Autotoolized build system?
> The flag
Hi,
I'm building a two node cluster with Centos 7.6 and DRBD. These nodes
are connected upstream to two Brocade switches. I'm trying to enable
fencing by using Digimer's fence_dlink_snmp script (
https://github.com/digimer/fence_dlink_snmp ).
I've renamed the script to fence_brocade_snmp and
Hi David,
The DLM git repo accumulated a couple of patches over the 4.0.7 tag,
would you mind cutting a new release for packaging?
Tangentially, would you be interested in an Autotoolized build system?
The flag handling repeatedly gives me headaches, and I'd consider
contributing that if you
On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 17:52 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> There has been some discussion in the past about generating more
> machine-friendly output from pacemaker CLI tools for scripting and
> high-level interfaces, as well as possibly adding a pacemaker REST
> API.
>
> I've filed an RFE BZ
>
>
On 27/11/18 14:35 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 27/11/18 12:29 +0200, Klecho wrote:
>> Big thanks for the answer, but I in your ways around I don't see a solution
>> for the following simple case:
>>
>> I have a few VMs (VirtualDomain RA) and just want and to stop a few of them,
>> not all.
>>
On 02/01/19 15:43 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 28/12/18 05:51 +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>> As a result, Pacemaker will stop without stopping the resource.
>
> This might have serious consequences in some scenarios, perhaps
> unless some watchdog-based solution (SBD?) was used as
17 matches
Mail list logo
