- Am 14. Aug 2019 um 19:07 schrieb kgaillot kgail...@redhat.com:
>> That's my setting:
>>
>> expected_votes: 2
>> two_node: 1
>> wait_for_all: 0
>>
>> no-quorum-policy=ignore
>>
>> I did that because i want be able to start the cluster although one
>> node has e.g. a hardware
On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 11:25 -0400, Nickle, Richard wrote:
>
> My objective is two-node active/passive DRBD device which would
> automatically fail over, a secondary objective would be to use
> standard, stock and supported software distributions and repositories
> with as little customization as
On 14/08/19 16:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> I am happy to announce that clufter, a tool/library for transforming
> and analyzing cluster configuration formats, got its version 0.77.2
> tagged and released (incl. signature using my 60BCBB4F5CD7F9EF key):
>
Hi,
Postgres Version: 9.6
OS: RHEL 6.9
We have a Postgres Cluster of 4 nodes in active-passive mode.
Cluster set up is A, B, C, D virtual machines. A is master, synchronizes to
B and C. C synchronizes to D. B, C and D are slaves. A and B are on Prod
server. C and D are on DR server.
A is
My objective is two-node active/passive DRBD device which would
automatically fail over, a secondary objective would be to use standard,
stock and supported software distributions and repositories with as little
customization as possible.
I'm using Ubuntu 18.04.3, plus the DRBD, corosync and
Thanks for the tips on the constraint rules.
I currently have two separate constraint for each ethmonitor - I did not
realise that you could have a constraint rule that can combine multiple
ethmonitors.
Based on your suggestion, I have now used one constraint, as such:
score=-INFINITY
I have tried both ifdown and using vmware to disconnect the interface from
the VM.
It is likely a constraint issue, as I don't have much experience with
corosync/pacemaker.
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 14:01, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 15/08/19 10:59 +0100, solarmon wrote:
> > I have a two node cluster
On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 10:59 +0100, solarmon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a two node cluster setup where each node is multi-homed over
> two separate external interfaces - net4 and net5 - that can have
> traffic load balanced between them.
>
> I have created multiple virtual ip resources (grouped
On 15/08/19 10:59 +0100, solarmon wrote:
> I have a two node cluster setup where each node is multi-homed over two
> separate external interfaces - net4 and net5 - that can have traffic load
> balanced between them.
>
> I have created multiple virtual ip resources (grouped together) that should
>
Hi,
I have a two node cluster setup where each node is multi-homed over two
separate external interfaces - net4 and net5 - that can have traffic load
balanced between them.
I have created multiple virtual ip resources (grouped together) that should
only be active on only one of the two nodes.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo