[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Active-Active cluster CentOS 8

2020-08-23 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Mark Battistella schrieb am 21.08.2020 um 09:04 in Nachricht : > Hi, > > I was wondering if I could get some help when following along with the > Clusters from Scratch part 9: > https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en‑US/Pacemaker/2.0/html‑single/Cluster >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Active-Active cluster CentOS 8

2020-08-23 Thread Strahil Nikolov
There is a topic about that at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16939 Based on the comments you can obtain it from  https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=4801 , but I haven' tested it. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В петък, 21 август 2020 г., 18:30:31 Гринуич+3, Mark

Re: [ClusterLabs] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.5: better start-up/shutdown coordination with sbd

2020-08-23 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Good to know it is now not needed. You are correct about logic, yes, I just forgot details. I just recall that sbd added too much load during cluster start and recoveries. Thank you! On August 23, 2020 1:23:37 PM Klaus Wenninger wrote: On 8/21/20 8:55 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.5: better start-up/shutdown coordination with sbd

2020-08-23 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 8/21/20 8:55 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi, > > btw, is sbd is now able to handle cib diffs internally? > Last time I tried to use it with frequently changing CIB, it became a > CPU hog - it requested full CIB copy on every change. Actually sbd should have been able to handle cib-diffs

Re: [ClusterLabs] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.5: better start-up/shutdown coordination with sbd

2020-08-23 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 8/22/20 11:02 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 21.08.2020 21:16, Ken Gaillot пишет: >> Previously at shutdown, sbd determined a clean pacemaker shutdown by >> checking whether any resources were running at shutdown. This would >> lead to sbd fencing if pacemaker shut down in maintenance mode with