On 2021-03-01 2:50 a.m., Ulrich Windl wrote:
Valentin Vidic schrieb am 28.02.2021 um
> 16:59
> in Nachricht <20210228155921.gm29...@valentin-vidic.from.hr>:
>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:34:20PM +, Eric Robinson wrote:
>>> 001db02b rebooted. After it came back up, I tried it in the other
On 2/26/21 12:39 PM, Niveditha U wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> We have xml data base called xdb which we want to use it as pcs
> resource. Hence, we created a custom resource agent script for the
> same. We are able to start/stop the xdb resource using debug-start and
> debug-stop but pacemaker is unable
On 2/28/21 12:32 PM, lejeczek wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> in case a developer(s) who might have something to do with RPM builds
> for Centos read this:
Looks as if it sees just the pacemaker-packages in AppStream to
be updated and not those in HighAvailability.
Sure the HighAvailability-repo is active?
Andrei,
On 01.03.2021 15:45, Jan Friesse wrote:
Andrei,
On 01.03.2021 12:26, Jan Friesse wrote:
Thanks for digging into logs. I believe Eric is hitting
https://github.com/corosync/corosync-qdevice/issues/10 (already fixed,
but may take some time to get into distributions) - it also
On 01.03.2021 15:45, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Andrei,
>
>> On 01.03.2021 12:26, Jan Friesse wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for digging into logs. I believe Eric is hitting
>>> https://github.com/corosync/corosync-qdevice/issues/10 (already fixed,
>>> but may take some time to get into distributions) - it
Andrei,
On 01.03.2021 12:26, Jan Friesse wrote:
Thanks for digging into logs. I believe Eric is hitting
https://github.com/corosync/corosync-qdevice/issues/10 (already fixed,
but may take some time to get into distributions) - it also contains
workaround.
I tested corosync-qnetd at
On 01.03.2021 12:26, Jan Friesse wrote:
>>
>
> Thanks for digging into logs. I believe Eric is hitting
> https://github.com/corosync/corosync-qdevice/issues/10 (already fixed,
> but may take some time to get into distributions) - it also contains
> workaround.
>
I tested corosync-qnetd at
On 27.02.2021 22:12, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On 27.02.2021 17:08, Eric Robinson wrote:
I agree, one node is expected to go out of quorum. Still the question is, why
didn't 001db01b take over the services? I just remembered that 001db01b has
services running on it, and those services did
Hi Team,
Can ocft be used in place of ocf-tester?
Regards,
Niveditha
From: Users on behalf of Reid Wahl
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 6:10 AM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] [EXTERNAL]
