If you experience multiple outages, you should consider enabling the kdump
feature of sbd. It will increase the takeover time, but might provide valuable
info.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 15:12, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
On 12/07/2021 15:50, kgail...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 12:34 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
Hi Admins(of this mailing list)
Could you please fix in DMARC(s) so those of us who are on
Yahoo would be able to receive own emails/thread.
many thanks, L.
I suppose we should do something,
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 15:28 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
>
> On 12/07/2021 15:50, kgail...@redhat.com wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 12:34 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > > Hi Admins(of this mailing list)
> > >
> > > Could you please fix in DMARC(s) so those of us who are on
> > > Yahoo would be able to
Hi , thanks for the quick reply.
I have a couple of follow up questions below in blue below
On 12/07/2021 23:27, Kiril Pashin wrote:> Hi ,> is it valid to use the same network adapter interface on the same host to be> part of multiple> heart beat rings ?There should be no problem from technical
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:28 PM Ulrich Windl <
ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> >>> damiano giuliani schrieb am 14.07.2021
> um
> 12:49
> in Nachricht
> :
> > Hi guys, thanks for helping,
> >
> > could be quite hard troubleshooting unexpected fails expecially if they
> are
> > not
Thank you all for your responses.I guess the decision should be based on the 3rd host's connectivity to the rest of the cluster. If the 3rd host can only communicate over a single network then I might as well use the QDevice, otherwise a full blown node would be preferable to take full advantage
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 01:27 +, S Sathish S wrote:
> Hi Tomas ,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> As you said ,Specifying an empty value for an option is a syntax for
> removing the option. Yes, this means there is no way to set an option
> to an empty string value using pcs.
>
> But our
>>> damiano giuliani schrieb am 14.07.2021 um
12:49
in Nachricht
:
> Hi guys, thanks for helping,
>
> could be quite hard troubleshooting unexpected fails expecially if they are
> not easily tracked on the pacemaker / system logs.
> all servers are baremetal , i requested the BMC logs hoping
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:50 PM damiano giuliani <
damianogiulian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys, thanks for helping,
>
> could be quite hard troubleshooting unexpected fails expecially if they
> are not easily tracked on the pacemaker / system logs.
> all servers are baremetal , i requested the
Hi guys, thanks for helping,
could be quite hard troubleshooting unexpected fails expecially if they are
not easily tracked on the pacemaker / system logs.
all servers are baremetal , i requested the BMC logs hoping there are some
informations.
you guys said the sbd is too tight, can you explain
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:56 PM Strahil Nikolov
wrote:
> In some cases the third location has a single IP and it makes sense to use
> it as QDevice. If it has multiple network connections to that location -
> use a full blown node .
If you are intending to use watchdog-fencing via sbd with a
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 6:40 AM Andrei Borzenkov
wrote:
> On 13.07.2021 23:09, damiano giuliani wrote:
> > Hi Klaus, thanks for helping, im quite lost because cant find out the
> > causes.
> > i attached the corosync logs of all three nodes hoping you guys can find
> > and hint me something i
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> What I meant is:
> The original signature confirms that the message is from the submitter
> (author).
> After mangling the message, you can't re-testify that the message is still
> from that author, but you can testify that the message is
>>> schrieb am 13.07.2021 um 16:04 in Nachricht
:
> On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 10:23 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> > > > schrieb am 12.07.2021 um 16:50 in
>> > > > Nachricht
>>
>> <08471514b28d1e3f6859707f5951f07887336865.ca...@redhat.com>:
>> > On Sat, 2021‑07‑10 at 12:34 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
>>
On 13/07/2021 19:07, Kiril Pashin wrote:
Hi , thanks for the quick reply.
I have a couple of follow up questions below in blue below
On 12/07/2021 23:27, Kiril Pashin wrote:
> Hi ,
> is it valid to use the same network adapter interface on the same host
to be
> part of
15 matches
Mail list logo
