After a LOT of hassle, I finally got it updated, but OMG it was painful.
I degraded the cluster (unsure if needed), set maintenance mode, deleted
the stonith levels, deleted the stonith devices, recreated them with the
updated values, recreated the stonith levels, and finally disabled
maintenance
Update;
Appears I can't even delete the damn things. They re-appeared after
doing a [pcs stonith remove '!.
Wow.
digimer
On 2021-07-23 7:56 p.m., Digimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Got a really odd one here...
>
> I had a cluster in the lab where it was built and tested. Then we
> deployed
Hi all,
Got a really odd one here...
I had a cluster in the lab where it was built and tested. Then we
deployed it, and I've been trying to update the stonith config. It
_seems_ to take at first, then it reverts back to the old config. This
is super annoying, obviously. :)
So I can confirm
Hi fellow,I saw your post on ClusterLabs and I have a question for you to solve my problem. Pcs Stonith is not started on the node and always Stopped. I did check the corosync.log and it said error is No route to host. Although I have been checking my configuration of IP, firewall, hosts file, I
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:52:00 +0200
damiano giuliani wrote:
> the time query isnt the problem, is known that took its time. the network
> is 10gbs bonding, quite impossible to sature with queries :=).
Everything is possible, it's just harder :)
[...]
> checking again the logs what for me is not
>>> damiano giuliani schrieb am 23.07.2021 um
>>> 12:52
in Nachricht
:
> hi guys thanks for supporting.
> the time query isnt the problem, is known that took its time. the network
> is 10gbs bonding, quite impossible to sature with queries :=).
> the servers are totally overkilled, at database
hi guys thanks for supporting.
the time query isnt the problem, is known that took its time. the network
is 10gbs bonding, quite impossible to sature with queries :=).
the servers are totally overkilled, at database full working loads 20% of
the resources have been used.
checking again the logs
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 8:55 AM Ulrich Windl <
ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> >>> "john tillman" schrieb am 22.07.2021 um 16:48 in
> Nachricht
> <1175ffcec0033015e13d11d7821d5acb.squir...@mail.panix.com>:
> > There was a lot of discussion on this topic which might have overshadowed
>>> "john tillman" schrieb am 22.07.2021 um 16:48 in
Nachricht
<1175ffcec0033015e13d11d7821d5acb.squir...@mail.panix.com>:
> There was a lot of discussion on this topic which might have overshadowed
> this question so I will ask it again in case someone missed it.
>
> It comes from a post (see
