Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Move a resource only where another has Started

2021-10-11 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 11.10.2021 10:15, Ulrich Windl wrote: Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 10.10.2021 um 16:52 in > Nachricht : >> On 10.10.2021 14:29, martin doc wrote: > > ... >> For each resource pacemaker computes allocation scores for each node >> (taking into account colocation). Node with the highest

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] unexpected fenced node and promotion of the new master PAF ‑ postgres

2021-10-11 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Hi, I kept the full answer in history to keep the list informed of your full answer. My answer down below. On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:33:12 +0200 damiano giuliani wrote: > ehy guys sorry for being late, was busy during the WE > > here i im: > > > > Did you see the swap activity (in/out, not

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.1.2: new fencing configuration options

2021-10-11 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ulrich Windl wrote: > >> Also how long would such a delay be: Long enough until the other node > >> is > >> fenced, or long enough until the other node was fenced, booted > >> (assuming it > >> does) and is running pacemaker? > > > > The delay should be on the

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Move a resource only where another has Started

2021-10-11 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 10.10.2021 um 16:52 in Nachricht : > On 10.10.2021 14:29, martin doc wrote: ... > For each resource pacemaker computes allocation scores for each node > (taking into account colocation). Node with the highest score wins. If > multiple nodes have the same score,

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Some unexpected DLM messages; OCFS2 related? "send_repeat_remove dir" / "send_repeat_remove dir"

2021-10-11 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Gang He schrieb am 09.10.2021 um 07:54 in Nachricht <3aaa716d-07a9-29f9-4504-9d5d339a6...@suse.com>: > Hello Ulrich, > > See my comments inline. > > > On 2021/10/8 16:38, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I just noticed these two messages on two nodes of a 3-node cluster: >> Oct 08

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.1.2: new fencing configuration options

2021-10-11 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 08.10.2021 um 20:16 in Nachricht <5d8817151b818580cc8cf1de5176d5d8ba9b5585.ca...@redhat.com>: > On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 08:18 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> > > > Ken Gaillot schrieb am 07.10.2021 um >> > > > 22:53 in >> Nachricht >>

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] unexpected fenced node and promotion of the new master PAF ‑ postgres

2021-10-11 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais schrieb am 09.10.2021 um 21:28 in Nachricht <20211009212843.1c8469af@firost>: ... > Indeed. But it's an arbitrage between swapping process mem or freeing > mem by removing data from cache. For database servers, it is advised to use > a > lower value for

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] unexpected fenced node and promotion of the new master PAF ‑ postgres

2021-10-11 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> damiano giuliani schrieb am 08.10.2021 um >>> 15:00 in Nachricht : > Hi Guys, after months of suddens unexpected failovers, checking every > corners and types of logs without any luck, cuz no logs and no reasons or If you have no logs, you should cleaerly check your configuration. ... >