Re: [ClusterLabs] Order constraint with a timeout?

2022-03-28 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 29.03.2022 00:26, john tillman wrote: >> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 14:03 -0400, john tillman wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> >>> Is it possible to have an order constraint with a timeout? I can't >>> find >>> one but perhaps I am using the wrong keywords in google. >>> >>> I have several Filesystem

Re: [ClusterLabs] Order constraint with a timeout?

2022-03-28 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 17:26 -0400, john tillman wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 14:03 -0400, john tillman wrote: > > > Greetings all, > > > > > > Is it possible to have an order constraint with a timeout? I > > > can't > > > find > > > one but perhaps I am using the wrong keywords in google. >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Order constraint with a timeout?

2022-03-28 Thread john tillman
> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 14:03 -0400, john tillman wrote: >> Greetings all, >> >> Is it possible to have an order constraint with a timeout? I can't >> find >> one but perhaps I am using the wrong keywords in google. >> >> I have several Filesystem resource and one nfs service resource. If >> I

Re: [ClusterLabs] Order constraint with a timeout?

2022-03-28 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 14:03 -0400, john tillman wrote: > Greetings all, > > Is it possible to have an order constraint with a timeout? I can't > find > one but perhaps I am using the wrong keywords in google. > > I have several Filesystem resource and one nfs service resource. If > I > create

[ClusterLabs] Order constraint with a timeout?

2022-03-28 Thread john tillman
Greetings all, Is it possible to have an order constraint with a timeout? I can't find one but perhaps I am using the wrong keywords in google. I have several Filesystem resource and one nfs service resource. If I create 3 order constraints: pcs constraint order start fsRsc1 then start

[ClusterLabs] Antw: heads up: series of core dumps in SLES15 SP3 ("kernel: BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000d1a9d1f5 idx:1 val:4")

2022-03-28 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I want to keep you updated: The problem isn't fixed, still, so I I'm running this simple script via cron to avoid uncontrolled kernel panic: ---snip--- #!/usr/bin/sh # Detect RAM corruption. If detected log a message and reboot # to prevent kernel panic #cron jobs need a PATH

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Corosync Transport‑ Knet Vs UDPU

2022-03-28 Thread Strahil Nikolov via Users
Corosync rings are never enough , especially when the network team has such naughty hands. Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 16:55, Ulrich Windl wrote: >>> Strahil Nikolov via Users schrieb am 28.03.2022 um 15:49 in Nachricht

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Corosync Transport‑ Knet Vs UDPU

2022-03-28 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Strahil Nikolov via Users schrieb am 28.03.2022 um 15:49 in Nachricht <1758982440.559085.1648475365...@mail.yahoo.com>: > One huge benefit of the new stack is that you can have 8 corosync rings, > which is really powerful. Hm I wonder: If one ring is not good enough and two rings are not

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync Transport- Knet Vs UDPU

2022-03-28 Thread Strahil Nikolov via Users
One huge benefit of the new stack is that you can have 8 corosync rings, which is really powerful. Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 9:27, Christine caulfield wrote: On 28/03/2022 03:30, Somanath Jeeva via Users wrote: > Hi , > > I am upgrading from corosync

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync Transport- Knet Vs UDPU

2022-03-28 Thread Christine caulfield
On 28/03/2022 03:30, Somanath Jeeva via Users wrote: Hi , I am upgrading from corosync 2.x/pacemaker 1.x to corosync 3.x/pacemaker 2.1.x In our use case we are using a 2 node corosync/pacemaker cluster. In corosync 2.x version I was using udpu as transport method. In the corosync 3.x , as