Re: [ClusterLabs] 2-Node Cluster - fencing with just one node running ?

2022-08-03 Thread Reid Wahl
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 2:59 PM Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > Hi, > > i have the following situation: > 2-node Cluster, just one node running (ha-idg-1). > The second node (ha-idg-2) is in standby. DLM monitor on ha-idg-1 times out. > Cluster tries to restart all services depending on DLM: > Aug 03

[ClusterLabs] 2-Node Cluster - fencing with just one node running ?

2022-08-03 Thread Lentes, Bernd
Hi, i have the following situation: 2-node Cluster, just one node running (ha-idg-1). The second node (ha-idg-2) is in standby. DLM monitor on ha-idg-1 times out. Cluster tries to restart all services depending on DLM: Aug 03 01:07:11 [19367] ha-idg-1pengine: notice: LogAction:*

Re: [ClusterLabs] cluster log not unambiguous about state of VirtualDomains

2022-08-03 Thread Ken Gaillot
The "found ... active" messages mean that it was the case at some point, not necessarily currently. Newer versions log much better messages like: info: Probe found rsc1 active on node1 at Aug 1 15:41:34 2022 so you can see it was a historical result. The later "Started" messages are where the

[ClusterLabs] cluster log not unambiguous about state of VirtualDomains

2022-08-03 Thread Lentes, Bernd
Hi, i have a strange behaviour found in the cluster log (/var/log/cluster/corosync.log). I KNOW that i put one node (ha-idg-2) in standby mode and stopped the pacemaker service on that node: The history of the shell says: 993 2022-08-02 18:28:25 crm node standby ha-idg-2 994 2022-08-02

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: About a false negative of storage_mon

2022-08-03 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 4:02 PM Ulrich Windl wrote: > > >>> Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 03.08.2022 um 15:51 in > Nachricht > : > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:10 PM Ken Gaillot wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Since O_DIRECT is not specified in

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: About a false negative of storage_mon

2022-08-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 03.08.2022 um 15:51 in Nachricht : > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:10 PM Ken Gaillot wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer >> > cache and >> > may result in a

Re: [ClusterLabs] Q: About a false negative of storage_mon

2022-08-03 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:10 PM Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer > > cache and > > may result in a false negative. I fear that this possibility > > increases > > in environments

[ClusterLabs] Heads up for ldirectord in SLES12 SP5 "Use of uninitialized value $ip_port in pattern match (m//) at /usr/sbin/ldirectord line 1830"

2022-08-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I wanted to inform you of an unpleasant bug in ldirectord of SLES12 SP5: We had a short network problem while some redundancy paths reconfigured in the infrastructure, effectively causing that some network services could not be reached. Unfortunately ldirectord controlled by the cluster

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: About a false negative of storage_mon

2022-08-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 03.08.2022 um 08:58 in Nachricht : > On 03.08.2022 09:02, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Ken Gaillot schrieb am 02.08.2022 um 16:09 in >> Nachricht >> <0a2125a43bbfc09d2ca5bad1a693710f00e33731.ca...@redhat.com>: >>> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: About a false negative of storage_mon

2022-08-03 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 03.08.2022 09:02, Ulrich Windl wrote: Ken Gaillot schrieb am 02.08.2022 um 16:09 in > Nachricht > <0a2125a43bbfc09d2ca5bad1a693710f00e33731.ca...@redhat.com>: >> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: About a false negative of storage_mon

2022-08-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> "Ulrich Windl" schrieb am 03.08.2022 um 08:02 in Nachricht <62ea0f6202a10004c...@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>: Ken Gaillot schrieb am 02.08.2022 um 16:09 in > Nachricht > <0a2125a43bbfc09d2ca5bad1a693710f00e33731.ca...@redhat.com>: >> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote: >>>

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: About a false negative of storage_mon

2022-08-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 02.08.2022 um 16:09 in Nachricht <0a2125a43bbfc09d2ca5bad1a693710f00e33731.ca...@redhat.com>: > On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer >> cache and >> may result in a false