Re: [ClusterLabs] Bug pacemaker with multiple IP

2022-12-20 Thread Reid Wahl
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 6:25 AM Thomas CAS wrote: > > Hello Ken, > > Thanks for your answer. > There was no update running at the time of the bug, which is why I thought > that having too many IPs caused this type of error. > The /usr/sbin/ip executable was not being modified either. > > We have

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Stonith

2022-12-20 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 11:33 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:07 AM Ulrich Windl > wrote: > > > But keep in mind that if the whole site is down (or unaccessible) > > > you > > > will not have access to IPMI/PDU/whatever on this site so your > > > stonith > > > agents

Re: [ClusterLabs] Bug pacemaker with multiple IP

2022-12-20 Thread Thomas CAS
Hello Ken, Thanks for your answer. There was no update running at the time of the bug, which is why I thought that having too many IPs caused this type of error. The /usr/sbin/ip executable was not being modified either. We have many clusters, and only this one has so many IPs and this problem.

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Stonith

2022-12-20 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:07 AM Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > > But keep in mind that if the whole site is down (or unaccessible) you > > will not have access to IPMI/PDU/whatever on this site so your stonith > > agents will fail ... > > But, considering the design, such site won't have a quorum and