On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 16:24 +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> On 9/27/23 16:02, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 15:42 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:21 PM Adam Cecile
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm struggling to understand if it's
On 9/27/23 16:02, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 15:42 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:21 PM Adam Cecile
wrote:
Hello,
I'm struggling to understand if it's possible to create some kind
of constraint to avoid two different resources to be running on the
same
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 15:42 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:21 PM Adam Cecile
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I'm struggling to understand if it's possible to create some kind
> > of constraint to avoid two different resources to be running on the
> > same host.
> >
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:21 PM Adam Cecile wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm struggling to understand if it's possible to create some kind of
> constraint to avoid two different resources to be running on the same host.
>
> Basically, I'd like to have floating IP "1" and floating IP "2" always being
Hi,
Probably utilization attributes may help with that. Try to add f.e. 'ip'
utilization attrubute with value '1' to both nodes, and then add the same
to VIP resources.
Adam Cecile 27 сентября 2023 г. 14:21:05 написал:
Hello,
I'm struggling to understand if it's possible to create some
Hello,
I'm struggling to understand if it's possible to create some kind of
constraint to avoid two different resources to be running on the same host.
Basically, I'd like to have floating IP "1" and floating IP "2" always
being assigned to DIFFERENT nodes.
Is that something possible ?
